From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Esben Haabendal Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c-mpc: generate START condition after STOP caused by read i2c_msg Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 22:10:56 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4A124202.4010201@doredevelopment.dk> <20090526213351.GG23114@fluff.org.uk> <20090528171726.GE3112@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090528171726.GE3112@pengutronix.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppe-linuxppc-embedded-2=m.gmane.org@ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppe-linuxppc-embedded-2=m.gmane.org@ozlabs.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Esben Haabendal , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Ben Dooks List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote: >> > Any blockers to get this accepted? >> >> It would be nice to get an ack from someone who can actually test >> the driver before getting this merged. > > I wanted to test it, but it does not apply due to line breaks (check > @@-line). Also, I don't really have the time to dig into the topic, so I > would only test it and give a tested-by-tag if it doesn't break anything > here. I think Joakim would be a good candidate for an acked-by . I've checked both my copy in my "Sent" folder and the copy received from the list, and I cannot see any "line break" breakage of the patch. It must be your mail client that is messing with it, so I cannot really do it much better in that way. If necessary, I can push a branch to a public repo you can pull from. /Esben