From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: "Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
"Jarkko Nikula" <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
"Wolfram Sang" <wsa@the-dreams.de>, "Len Brown" <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
"russianneuromancer @ ya . ru" <russianneuromancer@ya.ru>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] x86/platform/intel/iosf_mbi: Add a mutex for punit access
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 16:30:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d6acfed3-f778-fe6a-eda7-3de5e2ce9bb9@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1483888594.26691.8.camel@linux.intel.com>
Hi,
On 08-01-17 16:16, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-01-08 at 14:44 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> One some systems the punit accesses the pmic to change various
>> voltages
>> through the same bus as other kernel drivers use for e.g. battery
>> monitoring.
>>
>> If a driver sends requests to the punit which require the punit to
>> access
>> the pmic bus while another driver is also accessing the pmic bus
>> various
>> bad things happen.
>>
>> This commit adds a mutex to protect the punit against simultaneous
>> accesses
>> and 2 functions to lock / unlock this mutex.
>>
>> Note on these systems the i2c-bus driver will request a sempahore from
>> the
>> punit for exclusive access to the pmic bus when i2c drivers are
>> accessing
>> it, but this does not appear to be sufficient, we still need to avoid
>> making certain punit requests during the access window to avoid
>> problems.
>
> I'm fine with the patch, but please spell
> P-Unit
> PMIC
In the commit msg and comments, not in code you mean I assume ?
Regards,
Hans
>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
>
>>
>> BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155241
>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>> Tested-by: tagorereddy <tagore.chandan@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/include/asm/iosf_mbi.h | 31
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> arch/x86/platform/intel/iosf_mbi.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/iosf_mbi.h
>> b/arch/x86/include/asm/iosf_mbi.h
>> index b41ee16..91f5d16 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/iosf_mbi.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/iosf_mbi.h
>> @@ -88,6 +88,33 @@ int iosf_mbi_write(u8 port, u8 opcode, u32 offset,
>> u32 mdr);
>> */
>> int iosf_mbi_modify(u8 port, u8 opcode, u32 offset, u32 mdr, u32
>> mask);
>>
>> +/**
>> + * iosf_mbi_punit_lock() - Lock the punit mutex
>> + *
>> + * One some systems the punit accesses the pmic to change various
>> voltages
>> + * through the same bus as other kernel drivers use for e.g. battery
>> monitoring.
>> + *
>> + * If a driver sends requests to the punit which require the punit to
>> access the
>> + * pmic bus while another driver is also accessing the pmic bus
>> various bad
>> + * things happen.
>> + *
>> + * To avoid these problems this function must be called before
>> accessing the
>> + * punit or the pmic, be it through iosf_mbi* functions or through
>> other means.
>> + *
>> + * Note on these systems the i2c-bus driver will request a sempahore
>> from the
>> + * punit for exclusive access to the pmic bus when i2c drivers are
>> accessing it,
>> + * but this does not appear to be sufficient, we still need to avoid
>> making
>> + * certain punit requests during the access window to avoid problems.
>> + *
>> + * This function locks a mutex, as such it may sleep.
>> + */
>> +void iosf_mbi_punit_lock(void);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * iosf_mbi_punit_unlock() - Unlock the punit mutex
>> + */
>> +void iosf_mbi_punit_unlock(void);
>> +
>> #else /* CONFIG_IOSF_MBI is not enabled */
>> static inline
>> bool iosf_mbi_available(void)
>> @@ -115,6 +142,10 @@ int iosf_mbi_modify(u8 port, u8 opcode, u32
>> offset, u32 mdr, u32 mask)
>> WARN(1, "IOSF_MBI driver not available");
>> return -EPERM;
>> }
>> +
>> +static inline void iosf_mbi_punit_lock(void) {}
>> +static inline void iosf_mbi_punit_unlock(void) {}
>> +
>> #endif /* CONFIG_IOSF_MBI */
>>
>> #endif /* IOSF_MBI_SYMS_H */
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/intel/iosf_mbi.c
>> b/arch/x86/platform/intel/iosf_mbi.c
>> index edf2c54..75d8135 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/platform/intel/iosf_mbi.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/intel/iosf_mbi.c
>> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
>>
>> static struct pci_dev *mbi_pdev;
>> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(iosf_mbi_lock);
>> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(iosf_mbi_punit_mutex);
>>
>> static inline u32 iosf_mbi_form_mcr(u8 op, u8 port, u8 offset)
>> {
>> @@ -190,6 +191,18 @@ bool iosf_mbi_available(void)
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(iosf_mbi_available);
>>
>> +void iosf_mbi_punit_lock(void)
>> +{
>> + mutex_lock(&iosf_mbi_punit_mutex);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(iosf_mbi_punit_lock);
>> +
>> +void iosf_mbi_punit_unlock(void)
>> +{
>> + mutex_unlock(&iosf_mbi_punit_mutex);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(iosf_mbi_punit_unlock);
>> +
>> #ifdef CONFIG_IOSF_MBI_DEBUG
>> static u32 dbg_mdr;
>> static u32 dbg_mcr;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-08 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-08 13:44 [PATCH 0/7] coordinate cht i2c-pmic and i915-punit accesses Hans de Goede
2017-01-08 13:44 ` [PATCH 1/7] x86/platform/intel/iosf_mbi: Add a mutex for punit access Hans de Goede
2017-01-08 15:16 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-01-08 15:30 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2017-01-08 15:35 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-01-08 13:44 ` [PATCH 2/7] x86/platform/intel/iosf_mbi: Add a pmic bus access notifier Hans de Goede
2017-01-08 15:21 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-01-08 13:44 ` [PATCH 3/7] i2c: designware-baytrail: Take punit lock on bus acquire Hans de Goede
2017-01-08 15:27 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-01-08 15:39 ` Hans de Goede
2017-01-12 18:45 ` Wolfram Sang
2017-01-15 11:21 ` Hans de Goede
2017-01-15 11:45 ` Wolfram Sang
2017-01-15 15:11 ` Hans de Goede
2017-01-15 15:17 ` Wolfram Sang
2017-01-08 13:44 ` [PATCH 4/7] i2c: designware-baytrail: Call pmic_bus_access_notifier_chain Hans de Goede
2017-01-08 15:23 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-01-12 18:45 ` Wolfram Sang
2017-01-08 13:44 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915: Add intel_uncore_suspend / resume functions Hans de Goede
2017-01-08 13:44 ` [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915: Listen for pmic bus access notifications Hans de Goede
2017-01-08 13:44 ` [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915: Take punit lock when modifying punit settings Hans de Goede
2017-01-08 15:34 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-01-08 15:42 ` Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d6acfed3-f778-fe6a-eda7-3de5e2ce9bb9@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=russianneuromancer@ya.ru \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).