From: johannes.goede@oss.qualcomm.com
To: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>,
Hardik Prakash <hardikprakash.official@gmail.com>
Cc: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
wsa@kernel.org, brgl@bgdev.pl, basavaraj.natikar@amd.com,
linusw@kernel.org, nathan@kernel.org,
chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com,
Linux kernel regressions list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
trantiendat29042005@gmail.com
Subject: Re: i2c designware change broke touchpad of a thinkpad
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 14:33:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dbef6c37-0124-4b2b-b223-53362c659ff4@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7c410f84-86f2-48e7-bee9-4c5c038bd115@leemhuis.info>
Hi Thorsten,
On 17-Aug-26 1:12 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 8/17/26 11:51, johannes.goede@oss.qualcomm.com wrote:
>> On 14-Aug-26 12:09 PM, Hardik Prakash wrote:
>>> On Wed, 13 Aug 2026, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>>> Hardik, could you submit a revert to the lists? And then I'll provide my
>>>> Tested-by and ask Linus to directly pick this up?
>>>
>>> Sent: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260814100719.9548-1-hardikprakash.official@gmail.com/
>>>
>>> Verified on my end that it builds clean, boots clean, and correctly
>>> restores the original Yoga 7 race (expected tradeoff) without
>>> introducing anything else.
>
> Hans, thx for looking into this.
>> Thank you for submitting a revert for this. Note it looks like Torvalds himself
>> beat you to it and already reverted this for 7.2 final :)
>
> Yeah, I pointed Linus to this and a few others issues and then he
> reverted the change directly:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/628bbf10-29f1-4e9e-b23b-4c47657433b9@leemhuis.info/
>
>> I hit another problem caused by this now reverted change, where the PMIC
>> i2c bus would not show up on many Intel BYT/CHT devices. I wrote a fix for
>> this (attached) on top of the now reverted commit.
>
> FWIW, meanwhile "Tran Tien Dat" (now CCed) with -next ran into a problem
> on a MSI Modern 14 H D13MG that the revert seems to have resolved. But
> the symptoms were different: the two DesignWare I2C controllers in that
> machine apparently deferred probe forever and are never retried:
>
> 16.429266 platform i2c_designware.1: deferred probe pending: (reason
> unknown)
> 16.429286 platform i2c_designware.0: deferred probe pending: (reason
> unknown)
Right, that is actually the same thing which my patch (on top of the
non-reverted original commit) addresses on BYT / CHT devices.
When I wrote "the PMIC i2c bus would not show up" I meant that
the i2c-controller for that bus would never get registered with
the kernel because of the probe being deferred forever.
Regards,
Hans
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-17 12:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-18 5:43 [PATCH v13] i2c: designware: defer probe if child GpioInt controllers are not bound Hardik Prakash
2026-07-18 8:50 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-07-20 8:07 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-07-28 6:04 ` Hardik Prakash
2026-07-28 8:30 ` Andi Shyti
2026-08-07 14:07 ` i2c designware change broke touchpad of a thinkpad (was: i2c: designware: defer probe if child GpioInt controllers are not bound) Thorsten Leemhuis
2026-08-08 17:01 ` Hardik Prakash
[not found] ` <aneQvMN_Zet2b62n@ashevche-desk.local>
2026-08-09 16:19 ` i2c designware change broke touchpad of a thinkpad Thorsten Leemhuis
2026-08-10 5:23 ` Hardik Prakash
2026-08-10 5:36 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2026-08-10 5:54 ` Hardik Prakash
2026-08-10 6:48 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2026-08-12 4:59 ` Hardik Prakash
2026-08-12 5:21 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2026-08-12 5:45 ` Hardik Prakash
2026-08-12 12:34 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-08-13 5:30 ` Hardik Prakash
2026-08-13 10:56 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2026-08-14 10:09 ` Hardik Prakash
2026-08-17 9:51 ` johannes.goede
2026-08-17 11:12 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2026-08-17 11:24 ` Tiến Đạt Trần
2026-08-17 12:33 ` johannes.goede [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dbef6c37-0124-4b2b-b223-53362c659ff4@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=johannes.goede@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=basavaraj.natikar@amd.com \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com \
--cc=hardikprakash.official@gmail.com \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=regressions@leemhuis.info \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=trantiendat29042005@gmail.com \
--cc=wsa@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox