From: Luis Oliveira <Luis.Oliveira@synopsys.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Luis Oliveira <Luis.Oliveira@synopsys.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: designware: Remove needless pm_runtime_put_noidle() call
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 11:23:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <df26d065-54e4-a1ad-52e0-3a47b49e852f@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170817155708.iakoglf7qrdf66bc@ninjato>
On 17-Aug-17 16:57, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 05:34:44PM +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
>> I guess pm_runtime_put_noidle() call in i2c_dw_probe_slave() was copied
>> by accident from similar master mode adapter registration code. It is
>> unbalanced due missing pm_runtime_get_noresume() but harmless since it
>> doesn't decrease dev->power.usage_count below zero.
>>
>> In theory we can hit similar needless runtime suspend/resume cycle
>> during slave mode adapter registration that was happening when
>> registering the master mode adapter. See commit cd998ded5c12 ("i2c:
>> designware: Prevent runtime suspend during adapter registration").
>>
>> However, since we are slave, we can consider it as a wrong configuration
>> if we have other slaves attached under this adapter and can omit the
>> pm_runtime_get_noresume()/pm_runtime_put_noidle() calls for simplicity.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
>
> Applied to for-current, thanks! Not really a bugfix, but 2/2 is, so,
> well... BTW, Luis, are you still there? Holiday season?
>
Hi all,
Sorry I was on holidays yes. I will get my setup ready to test this ASAP.
But it makes sense what Jarkko said in 2/2.
If it helps, for what I can remember I also used i2c-rcar slave mode as
inspiration for this implementation.
Thank you,
Luis
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-08 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-15 14:34 [PATCH 1/2] i2c: designware: Remove needless pm_runtime_put_noidle() call Jarkko Nikula
2017-08-15 14:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] i2c: designware: Fix runtime PM for I2C slave mode Jarkko Nikula
2017-08-17 15:57 ` Wolfram Sang
2017-08-17 15:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] i2c: designware: Remove needless pm_runtime_put_noidle() call Wolfram Sang
2017-09-08 10:23 ` Luis Oliveira [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=df26d065-54e4-a1ad-52e0-3a47b49e852f@synopsys.com \
--to=luis.oliveira@synopsys.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).