From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22BD6C433F5 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 09:04:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237794AbiCNJFM (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Mar 2022 05:05:12 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52542 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237817AbiCNJFJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Mar 2022 05:05:09 -0400 Received: from mga17.intel.com (mga17.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7764538DBC; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 02:03:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1647248639; x=1678784639; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:references:from: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rXqMSiiScsFnB1lwJAoSQ/GddK2AO3oaWxzf7gIkAbI=; b=aokcrmbR2A0ImY3whZJNWsGUwAcp+ORtjP1ef7nLLgppXDNvVYR+J5Cm AfF+dBlGbA1vxkF/xDJ0LEboS8+Ypr4E1tV6Z7fvJGBFe5NWoaz3zHX/W ObA1Vn7OUUAacylmnYCU1/Jx8v1Pz/7h92DnH/T/T8mvke1SCE6Gjyklp ONn7b1mEp90nzt1tOfGJZ/7ka+yOc0dbEslU7PS7S1nPxmOoAwVecm+nm mf43VaDAOjLE2VNgjeF/xY0jyqOSbxMGnSepcdbMceSn0e06xScpNVL9j G5Dds/jLr7+8jnKdkhbPSf7cTPKE7iR4nJ/S6sYA48aJk69uWtxYHJpwh g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10285"; a="236578018" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,180,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="236578018" Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Mar 2022 02:03:55 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,180,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="539884104" Received: from mylly.fi.intel.com (HELO [10.237.72.168]) ([10.237.72.168]) by orsmga007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Mar 2022 02:03:52 -0700 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 11:03:51 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 Thunderbird/91.6.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 -next] i2c: designware: Remove code duplication Content-Language: en-US To: Wolfram Sang , Jan Dabros , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, upstream@semihalf.com References: <20220310220932.140973-1-jsd@semihalf.com> From: Jarkko Nikula In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On 3/11/22 22:51, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 11:09:32PM +0100, Jan Dabros wrote: >> Simplify code by moving common part to one function. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Dabros >> Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko > > Is it really based on for-next? I can't apply the patch. Am I missing > something? > Looks like Jan's patch is done without commit 1e4fe5430bd7 ("i2c: designware: remove unneeded semicolon") and that causes the git am not able to apply it while plain patch is not so strict "Hunk #2 succeeded at 260 with fuzz 1.". Jarkko