From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: core: ACPI: Properly set status byte to 0 for multi-byte writes
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 10:44:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e7cb34af-4e4d-866e-996f-07d3eb490ed6@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9d9abf08-7112-5eb9-f5e8-493baba17034@axentia.se>
Hi,
On 12-08-18 22:39, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2018-08-12 12:53, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> acpi_gsb_i2c_write_bytes() returns i2c_transfer()'s return value, which
>> is the number of transfers executed on success, so 1.
>>
>> The ACPI code expects us to store 0 in gsb->status for success, not 1.
>>
>> Specifically this breaks the following code in the Thinkpad 8 DSDT:
>>
>> ECWR = I2CW = ECWR /* \_SB_.I2C1.BAT0.ECWR */
>> If ((ECST == Zero))
>> {
>> ECRD = I2CR /* \_SB_.I2C1.I2CR */
>> }
>>
>> Before this commit we set ECST to 1, causing the read to never happen
>> breaking battery monitoring on the Thinkpad 8.
>>
>> This commit makes acpi_gsb_i2c_write_bytes() return 0 when i2c_transfer()
>> returns 1, so the single write transfer completed successfully, and
>> makes it return -EIO on for other (unexpected) return values >= 0.
>
> I'm wondering if this might be fallout from one of
> 35cd67a0caf7 ("i2c: viperboard: return message count on master_xfer success")
> de9a8634f1cb ("i2c: pmcmsp: return message count on master_xfer success")
No, these are using the designware driver, so these commits are not
the cause, this simply is a long standing bug.
Regards,
Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-13 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-12 10:53 [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: core: ACPI: Properly set status byte to 0 for multi-byte writes Hans de Goede
2018-08-12 20:39 ` Peter Rosin
2018-08-13 8:44 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2018-08-13 9:38 ` Mika Westerberg
2018-08-20 12:10 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e7cb34af-4e4d-866e-996f-07d3eb490ed6@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=peda@axentia.se \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).