From: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>, <wsa@kernel.org>,
<jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
<mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>, <jsd@semihalf.com>
Cc: <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<patches@opensource.cirrus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: designware: Fix unbalanced suspended flag
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 13:36:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e8b6733c-33b8-cb28-a62b-21dad9bd6466@opensource.cirrus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e9d113fb-5cd1-d93d-3d8f-fa9c1e55a8e2@redhat.com>
On 9/12/22 12:15, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> On 12/9/22 12:40, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
>> Ensure that i2c_mark_adapter_suspended() is always balanced by a call to
>> i2c_mark_adapter_resumed().
<snip>
>
> It is not entirely clear to me where the unbalance you claim to see comes
> from? When runtime-suspended SMART_SUSPEND should keep it suspended at which point
> the system suspend callback will never run ?
>
> Are you sure that you are not maybe seeing a suspend/resume ordering issue?
>
> Did you add printk messages to the suspend/resume callbacks of
> i2c-designware-platdrv.c which show the system suspend callback
> being called but not the system resume one ?
>
With messages in strategic places.
[ 169.607358] i2c_designware i2c_designware.2: PM: dev_pm_skip_suspend:
SMART_SUSPEND=0 pm_runtime_status_suspended=1
[ 169.607361] i2c_designware i2c_designware.2: PM:
__device_suspend_late: dev_pm_skip_suspend:false
[ 169.607364] i2c_designware i2c_designware.2: dw_i2c_plat_suspend
...
[ 169.702511] i2c_designware i2c_designware.2: PM: dev_pm_skip_resume:
1 because !power.must_resume
[ 169.706241] i2c_designware i2c_designware.2: PM: dev_pm_skip_resume:
1 because !power.must_resume
[ 169.706244] i2c_designware i2c_designware.2: PM: device_resume_early:
dev_pm_skip_resume:true
...
[ 175.254832] i2c i2c-2: Transfer while suspended
(Just to prove my logging isn't lying, for i2c3 it reports
SMART_SUSPEND=1)
So it can skip the resume even if it didn't skip the suspend.
The SMART_SUSPEND flag is not set on i2c2 and the driver core can
skip resume even if it didn't skip suspend.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-09 13:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-09 11:40 [PATCH] i2c: designware: Fix unbalanced suspended flag Richard Fitzgerald
2022-12-09 12:15 ` Hans de Goede
2022-12-09 12:29 ` Richard Fitzgerald
2022-12-09 13:36 ` Richard Fitzgerald [this message]
2022-12-09 14:22 ` Richard Fitzgerald
2022-12-09 18:16 ` Hans de Goede
2022-12-09 13:40 ` Richard Fitzgerald
2022-12-09 14:04 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e8b6733c-33b8-cb28-a62b-21dad9bd6466@opensource.cirrus.com \
--to=rf@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jsd@semihalf.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=patches@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=wsa@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox