From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
To: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] i2c: i801: make FEATURE_BLOCK_PROC dependent on FEATURE_BLOCK_BUFFER
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 21:57:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ea1a64c4-b5f7-d25d-daba-6294a9e3dba8@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220607161320.6ce0db40@endymion.delvare>
On 07.06.2022 16:13, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Heiner,
>
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 18:55:46 +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> According to the datasheet the block process call requires block
>> buffer mode. The user may disable block buffer mode by module
>> parameter disable_features, in such a case we have to clear
>> FEATURE_BLOCK_PROC.
>
> In which datasheet are you seeing this? Can you point me to the
> specific section and/or quote the statement? I can't find it in the
> datasheet I'm looking at (ICH9, Intel document 316972-002) but it is
> huge and I may just be missing it.
>
I used the following datasheet:
Intel 9 Series Chipset Family PCH
330550-002
On page 211 the block process call is described.
There's a note: E32B bit in the Auxiliary Control register must be set when using this protocol.
The same note can be found on page 663.
> Also, same request as previous patch, I'd like a comment in the code,
> so that developers don't have to read the git log to figure out why this
> piece of code is there.
>
OK
> Furthermore, as far as I can see, the FEATURE_BLOCK_PROC flag only
> affects the value returned by i801_func(). i801_access() does not
> verify whether this flag is set before processing a command where size
> == I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_PROC_CALL. I think it should? Otherwise your fix is
> only partial (will work if the device driver calls .functionality as it
> is supposed to, will fail with - I suppose - unpredictable results if
> the device driver calls .smbus_xfer directly).
>
If FEATURE_BLOCK_PROC isn't set then we would call
i801_block_transaction_byte_by_byte() according to the following code
in i801_block_transaction().
if ((priv->features & FEATURE_BLOCK_BUFFER) &&
command != I2C_SMBUS_I2C_BLOCK_DATA)
result = i801_block_transaction_by_block(priv, data,
read_write,
command);
else
result = i801_block_transaction_byte_by_byte(priv, data,
read_write,
command);
And i801_block_transaction_byte_by_byte() immediately returns
-EOPNOTSUPP in case of command == I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_PROC_CALL.
Having said that the requested check is there, it's just executed
a little bit later.
>> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c
>> index eccdc7035..1d8182901 100644
>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c
>> @@ -1675,6 +1675,9 @@ static int i801_probe(struct pci_dev *dev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
>> }
>> priv->features &= ~disable_features;
>>
>> + if (!(priv->features & FEATURE_BLOCK_BUFFER))
>> + priv->features &= ~FEATURE_BLOCK_PROC;
>> +
>> err = pcim_enable_device(dev);
>> if (err) {
>> dev_err(&dev->dev, "Failed to enable SMBus PCI device (%d)\n",
>
> Thanks,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-17 8:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-15 16:53 [PATCH 0/8] i2c: i801: Series with minor improvements Heiner Kallweit
2022-04-15 16:54 ` [PATCH 1/8] i2c: i801: improve interrupt handler Heiner Kallweit
2022-06-07 12:34 ` Jean Delvare
2022-12-15 22:15 ` Heiner Kallweit
2022-04-15 16:55 ` [PATCH 2/8] i2c: i801: make FEATURE_HOST_NOTIFY dependent on FEATURE_IRQ Heiner Kallweit
2022-06-07 12:48 ` Jean Delvare
2022-12-16 20:23 ` Heiner Kallweit
2022-04-15 16:55 ` [PATCH 3/8] i2c: i801: make FEATURE_BLOCK_PROC dependent on FEATURE_BLOCK_BUFFER Heiner Kallweit
2022-06-07 14:13 ` Jean Delvare
2022-12-16 20:57 ` Heiner Kallweit [this message]
2022-04-15 16:56 ` [PATCH 4/8] i2c: i801: enable FEATURE_IRQ and FEATURE_I2C_BLOCK_READ on all chip versions Heiner Kallweit
2022-06-07 14:24 ` Jean Delvare
2022-06-13 17:08 ` Jean Delvare
2022-06-14 12:59 ` Jean Delvare
2022-12-16 21:36 ` Heiner Kallweit
2022-04-15 16:57 ` [PATCH 5/8] i2c: i801: add helper i801_set_hstadd() Heiner Kallweit
2022-06-09 13:53 ` Jean Delvare
2022-12-16 21:37 ` Heiner Kallweit
2022-04-15 16:58 ` [PATCH 6/8] i2c: i801: add i801_single_transaction(), complementing i801_block_transaction() Heiner Kallweit
2022-06-10 11:03 ` Jean Delvare
2022-12-17 17:07 ` Heiner Kallweit
2022-04-15 16:58 ` [PATCH 7/8] i2c: i801: call i801_check_pre() from i801_access() Heiner Kallweit
2022-06-10 13:52 ` Jean Delvare
2022-04-15 16:59 ` [PATCH 8/8] i2c: i801: call i801_check_post() " Heiner Kallweit
2022-06-10 14:31 ` Jean Delvare
2022-12-17 17:21 ` Heiner Kallweit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ea1a64c4-b5f7-d25d-daba-6294a9e3dba8@gmail.com \
--to=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).