Re: [PATCH 2/2] i2c: mux: pinctrl: drop the idle_state member

[Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>]

On 08/02/2017 03:25 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2017-08-02 21:06, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 08/02/2017 01:27 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>>> The information is available elsewhere.
>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pinctrl.c b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pinctrl.c
>>
>>>    static int i2c_mux_pinctrl_deselect(struct i2c_mux_core *muxc, u32 chan)
>>>    {
>>> +	return i2c_mux_pinctrl_select(muxc, muxc->num_adapters);
>>>    }
>>
>>> @@ -166,7 +162,7 @@ static int i2c_mux_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>>>    	/* Do not add any adapter for the idle state (if it's there at all). */
>>> -	for (i = 0; i < num_names - !!mux->state_idle; i++) {
>>> +	for (i = 0; i < num_names - !!muxc->deselect; i++) {
>>
>> I think that "num_names - !!muxc->deselect" could just be
>> muxc->num_adapters?
> 
> Not really, it's the i2c_mux_add_adapter call in the loop that bumps
> muxc->num_adapters, so the loop would not be entered. Not desirable :-)

Ok, that makes sense.

> (and muxc->max_adapters == num_names)

Well, unless muxc->deselect is true...