From: Phil Reid <preid@electromag.com.au>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: designware: Round down ACPI provided clk to nearest supported clk
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 09:23:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f05a083c-c8d1-352f-d084-1ccf5e37e14c@electromag.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170829210048.mqcyep22tqn7t65l@ninjato>
On 30/08/2017 05:00, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
>> The speed comes from an ACPI entry describing an i2c client,
>> any compliant i2c client must at least support 100KHz, right ?
>
> Well, due to flaky board design, you may not be able to utilize the max
> speed because of interferences etc even if the devices would support it.
> Such knowledge of flaky boards could be encoded in the ACPI tables, or?
> But probably not in the client device, hmmm...
>
>> Alternatively I could wrap the entire round-down for loop in
>> an if (acpi_speed) {} block.
>
> I don't know enough about real-world ACPI tables to suggest a best
> practice here. I just wanted to add that busses < 100 kHz are legal from
> how I read the specs.
>
> Oh well, Jarkko liked the patch, so let's all sleep over this patch and
> if nothing else comes up, I'll apply it tomorrow or so...
>
My understanding is 100k is what the client must support.
But sometimes buses need to be run slower.
Particularly when using range extenders.
eg: I have an i2c bus running over a 10m cable that needs to run at about 40k
to be reliable.
--
Regards
Phil Reid
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-30 1:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-29 12:08 [PATCH] i2c: designware: Round down ACPI provided clk to nearest supported clk Hans de Goede
2017-08-29 12:22 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-08-29 12:52 ` Hans de Goede
2017-08-29 14:12 ` Jarkko Nikula
2017-08-29 20:18 ` Wolfram Sang
2017-08-29 20:27 ` Hans de Goede
2017-08-29 21:00 ` Wolfram Sang
2017-08-30 1:23 ` Phil Reid [this message]
2017-08-30 7:37 ` Jarkko Nikula
2017-08-31 18:29 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f05a083c-c8d1-352f-d084-1ccf5e37e14c@electromag.com.au \
--to=preid@electromag.com.au \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).