From: Kewei Xu <kewei.xu@mediatek.com>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Cc: <wsa@the-dreams.de>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>, <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
Devicetree List <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>,
<leilk.liu@mediatek.com>, <qii.wang@mediatek.com>,
<yuhan.wei@mediatek.com>, <ot_daolong.zhu@mediatek.com>,
<liguo.zhang@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] i2c: mediatek: Reset the handshake signal between i2c and dma
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2021 15:40:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fce8934ec25d18307df11e2f308a255da5a25ce3.camel@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXv+5EGpUV0eaQ6duZ8y8u2dvc1y3uc2YwWP=07D+ZZpzMCvQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 2021-08-11 at 16:41 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 6:29 PM Kewei Xu <kewei.xu@mediatek.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Due to changes in the hardware design of the handshaking signal
> > between i2c and dma, it is necessary to reset the handshaking
> > signal before each transfer to ensure that the multi-msgs can
> > be transferred correctly.
>
> This also affects MT8192. Has this been tested on that SoC as well?
Yes, It has been tested on MT8192.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Kewei Xu <kewei.xu@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c
> > b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c
> > index 222ff765e55d..c0108387f34b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c
> > @@ -47,6 +47,9 @@
> > #define I2C_RD_TRANAC_VALUE 0x0001
> > #define I2C_SCL_MIS_COMP_VALUE 0x0000
> > #define I2C_CHN_CLR_FLAG 0x0000
> > +#define I2C_CLR_DEBUGCTR 0x0000
> > +#define I2C_RELIABILITY 0x0010
> > +#define I2C_DMAACK_ENABLE 0x0008
> >
> > #define I2C_DMA_CON_TX 0x0000
> > #define I2C_DMA_CON_RX 0x0001
> > @@ -850,6 +853,17 @@ static int mtk_i2c_do_transfer(struct mtk_i2c
> > *i2c, struct i2c_msg *msgs,
> >
> > reinit_completion(&i2c->msg_complete);
> >
> > + if (i2c->dev_comp->apdma_sync) {
> > + mtk_i2c_writew(i2c, I2C_CLR_DEBUGCTR,
> > OFFSET_DEBUGCTRL);
> > + writel(I2C_DMA_HANDSHAKE_RST | I2C_DMA_WARM_RST,
> > + i2c->pdmabase + OFFSET_RST);
> > + writel(I2C_DMA_CLR_FLAG, i2c->pdmabase +
> > OFFSET_RST);
>
> I2C_DMA_WARM_RST is self-clearing. Is I2C_DMA_HANDSHAKE_RST not
> self-clearing? If both are self-clearing, don't you need to wait and
> check for them to cleared? If they aren't self-clearing, do you need
> to delay some time for them to complete?
>
Thank you for your suggestion. We will appropriately add the delay in
the next version of patch according to the hardware behavior
characteristics.
Regards
Kewei
> > + mtk_i2c_writew(i2c, I2C_HANDSHAKE_RST,
> > OFFSET_SOFTRESET);
> > + mtk_i2c_writew(i2c, I2C_CHN_CLR_FLAG,
> > OFFSET_SOFTRESET);
>
> Same here. No time delay needed?
>
> > + mtk_i2c_writew(i2c, I2C_RELIABILITY |
> > I2C_DMAACK_ENABLE,
> > + OFFSET_DEBUGCTRL);
>
> A comment explaining what the section above does would be nice.
> AFAICU
> this is force resetting the DMA handling.
>
>
> Regards
> ChenYu
>
> > + }
> > +
> > control_reg = mtk_i2c_readw(i2c, OFFSET_CONTROL) &
> > ~(I2C_CONTROL_DIR_CHANGE | I2C_CONTROL_RS);
> > if ((i2c->speed_hz > I2C_MAX_FAST_MODE_PLUS_FREQ) ||
> > (left_num >= 1))
> > --
> > 2.18.0
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-mediatek mailing list
> > Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-21 7:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-17 10:17 [PATCH V4 0/8] Introduce an attribute to choose timing setting Kewei Xu
2021-07-17 10:17 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] i2c: mediatek: fixing the incorrect register offset Kewei Xu
2021-07-17 10:17 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] dt-bindings: i2c: update bindings for MT8195 SoC Kewei Xu
2021-07-17 10:17 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] i2c: mediatek: Reset the handshake signal between i2c and dma Kewei Xu
2021-08-11 8:41 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2021-08-21 7:40 ` Kewei Xu [this message]
2021-07-17 10:17 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] i2c: mediatek: Dump i2c/dma register when a timeout occurs Kewei Xu
2021-07-17 10:17 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] dt-bindings: i2c: add attribute default-timing-adjust Kewei Xu
2021-07-22 3:10 ` Rob Herring
2021-08-18 6:37 ` Kewei Xu
2021-07-17 10:17 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] i2c: mediatek: Add OFFSET_EXT_CONF setting back Kewei Xu
2021-07-17 10:17 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] i2c: mediatek: Isolate speed setting via dts for special devices Kewei Xu
2021-07-17 10:17 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] i2c: mediatek: modify bus speed calculation formula Kewei Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fce8934ec25d18307df11e2f308a255da5a25ce3.camel@mediatek.com \
--to=kewei.xu@mediatek.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=leilk.liu@mediatek.com \
--cc=liguo.zhang@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=ot_daolong.zhu@mediatek.com \
--cc=qii.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
--cc=wenst@chromium.org \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=yuhan.wei@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).