From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
To: Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Claudio Foellmi <claudio.foellmi@ergon.ch>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: "Nori, Sekhar" <nsekhar@ti.com>, "Cooper Jr.,
Franklin" <fcooper@ti.com>, Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: omap: Trigger bus recovery in lockup case
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 07:30:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fe0ccc55-06c1-bedd-60f4-a2d10d2434b0@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4aa7db09-f9b5-3140-24e7-179e8933e832@ti.com>
On 10/05/2017 01:01 AM, Vignesh R wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wednesday 04 October 2017 03:13 PM, Claudio Foellmi wrote:
>> A very conservative check for bus activity (to prevent interference
>> in multimaster setups) prevented the bus recovery methods from being
>> triggered in the case that SDA or SCL was stuck low.
>> This defeats the purpose of the recovery mechanism, which was introduced
>> for exactly this situation (a slave device keeping SDA pulled down).
>>
>> Also added a check to make sure SDA is low before attempting recovery.
>> If SDA is not stuck low, recovery will not help, so we can skip it.
>>
>> Note that bus lockups can persist across reboots. The only other options
>> are to reset or power cycle the offending slave device, and many i2c
>> slaves do not even have a reset pin.
>>
>> If we see that one of the lines is low for the entire timeout duration,
>> we can actually be sure that there is no other master driving the bus.
>> It is therefore save for us to attempt a bus recovery.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Claudio Foellmi <claudio.foellmi@ergon.ch>
>> Cc: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
>> Cc: Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com>
>> ---
>> Changes since v1:
>> Added a check before all bus recoveries, to make sure SDA actually is
>> low. This should prevent most unnecessary attempts, which are not
>> without risk.
>>
>
> Thanks for the patch! This fixes my case. I no longer see recovery
> attempt or IRQ flood:
> Tested-by: Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
--
regards,
-grygorii
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-05 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-14 15:39 [PATCH] i2c-omap: Trigger bus recovery in lockup case Claudio Foellmi
2017-09-15 23:31 ` Grygorii Strashko
2017-09-18 5:24 ` Vignesh R
2017-09-18 12:01 ` Claudio Foellmi
2017-09-19 10:50 ` Vignesh R
2017-09-20 9:24 ` Claudio Foellmi
2017-09-20 15:02 ` Sebastian Reichel
2017-09-26 12:24 ` Claudio Foellmi
2017-09-29 12:52 ` Sebastian Reichel
2017-09-29 15:17 ` Claudio Foellmi
2017-09-29 16:37 ` Sebastian Reichel
2017-10-02 23:01 ` Grygorii Strashko
2017-10-06 15:22 ` Sebastian Reichel
2017-10-03 10:32 ` Vignesh R
2017-10-04 9:43 ` [PATCH v2] i2c: omap: " Claudio Foellmi
2017-10-05 6:01 ` Vignesh R
2017-10-05 12:30 ` Grygorii Strashko [this message]
2017-10-28 20:52 ` Wolfram Sang
2017-10-30 9:11 ` Claudio Foellmi
2017-10-30 14:19 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fe0ccc55-06c1-bedd-60f4-a2d10d2434b0@ti.com \
--to=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=aaro.koskinen@iki.fi \
--cc=claudio.foellmi@ergon.ch \
--cc=fcooper@ti.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
--cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).