From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add a new-style driver for most I2C EEPROMs
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:13:46 +0200
Message-ID: <fu1v4r$tqf$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <1207914198-8561-1-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de>	<ftnlao$o2r$1@ger.gmane.org>	<20080414072227.GU13814@pengutronix.de>
	<20080414143925.31b55b39@hyperion.delvare>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <i2c-bounces-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <20080414143925.31b55b39-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c>,
	<mailto:i2c-request-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/i2c>
List-Post: <mailto:i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2c-request-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c>,
	<mailto:i2c-request-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: i2c-bounces-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org
Errors-To: i2c-bounces-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org
To: i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org
List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org

> drivers, so "i2c-eeprom" would be confusing. "at24" is just fine and I
> see no reason to change the name.  The Linux driver tree is full of
> vendor-specific names, and this has never been a problem.
I just wondered why we should pick one vendor's name altough the driver 
is designed to work for all vendors. Not the biggest question at the 
moment, though ;)

    Wolfram

-- 
   Dipl.-Ing. Wolfram Sang | http://www.pengutronix.de
  Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry


_______________________________________________
i2c mailing list
i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c