From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Lawnick <nospam_lawnick-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: Request for Clarification: old - legacy - new driver model
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:16:46 +0100
Message-ID: <go6bp4$i9k$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <gngvea$eqj$1@ger.gmane.org>	<20090218173645.GD3049@pengutronix.de>	<gnjplc$hqd$1@ger.gmane.org>	<20090220135300.353cd53a@hyperion.delvare>	<go12jd$ec4$1@ger.gmane.org>	<20090225090002.2c31dbf1@hyperion.delvare>	<go5ta2$rtu$1@ger.gmane.org> <20090226142854.2b6f72e4@hyperion.delvare>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090226142854.2b6f72e4-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
To: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org

Jean Delvare said the following:
> Hi Michael,
> 
> On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:09:52 +0100, Michael Lawnick wrote:
>> Therefore I asked for links in the OP so I can understand the idea of
>> the so called 'new I2C model'. The kernel documentation seems not to be
>> sufficient to achieve my goals.
>> Currently I'm waiting for 2 MUXes and an LM75, so I can connect them to
>> our current MUX-less board and start to play.
> 
> The documentation might not be perfect, right. It should become clearer
> once we get completely rid of the legacy model. Contributions to
> enhance the documentation are welcome, too.
> 
Just in short:
Don't feel criticized here. The documentation feels excellent for making
new devices. But what I'm searching for are 'inner' documents, which
AFAICS LINUX lacks almost completely.

Kind Regards,
Michael