From: jassi brar <jassisinghbrar-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Mark Brown
<broonie-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>,
linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-s3c2410: Remove unconditional 1ms delay on each transfer
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 22:00:52 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <p2q1b68c6791004020600g283db571gacd0f8b7e4ddaf6@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1270211946-25103-1-git-send-email-broonie-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Mark Brown
<broonie-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> The S3C I2C controller indicates completion of I2C transfers before
> the bus has a stop condition on it. In order to ensure that we do not
> attempt to start a new transfer before the bus is idle the driver
> currently inserts a 1ms delay. This is vastly larger than is generally
> required and has a visible effect on performance under load, such as
> when bringing up audio CODECs or reading back status information with
> non-bulk I2C reads.
>
> Replace the sleep with a spin on the IIC status register for up to 1ms.
> This will busy wait but testing on my SMDK6410 system indicates that
> the overwhelming majority of transactions complete on the first spin,
> with maximum latencies of less than 10 spins so the absolute overhead
> of busy waiting should be at worst comprable to msleep(), and the
> overall system performance is dramatically improved.
>
> The main risk is poor interaction with multimaster systems where
> we may miss the bus going idle before the next transaction. Defend
> against this by falling back to the original 1ms delay after 20 spins.
>
> The overall effect in my testing is an approximately 20% improvement
> in kernel startup time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c
> index d27072b..ba52543 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c
> @@ -482,7 +482,8 @@ static int s3c24xx_i2c_set_master(struct s3c24xx_i2c *i2c)
> static int s3c24xx_i2c_doxfer(struct s3c24xx_i2c *i2c,
> struct i2c_msg *msgs, int num)
> {
> - unsigned long timeout;
> + unsigned long iicstat, timeout;
> + int spins = 20;
> int ret;
>
> if (i2c->suspended)
> @@ -521,7 +522,22 @@ static int s3c24xx_i2c_doxfer(struct s3c24xx_i2c *i2c,
>
> /* ensure the stop has been through the bus */
>
> - msleep(1);
> + dev_dbg(i2c->dev, "waiting for bus idle\n");
> +
> + /* first, try busy waiting briefly */
> + spins = 0;
^^^^^^^^^^^^ ?
> + do {
> + iicstat = readl(i2c->regs + S3C2410_IICSTAT);
> + } while ((iicstat & S3C2410_IICSTAT_START) && --spins);
> +
> + /* if that timed out sleep */
> + if (!spins) {
> + msleep(1);
> + iicstat = readl(i2c->regs + S3C2410_IICSTAT);
> + }
> +
> + if (iicstat & S3C2410_IICSTAT_START)
> + dev_warn(i2c->dev, "timeout waiting for bus idle\n");
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-02 13:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-02 12:39 [PATCH] i2c-s3c2410: Remove unconditional 1ms delay on each transfer Mark Brown
[not found] ` <1270211946-25103-1-git-send-email-broonie-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-02 13:00 ` jassi brar [this message]
[not found] ` <p2q1b68c6791004020600g283db571gacd0f8b7e4ddaf6-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-02 13:13 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=p2q1b68c6791004020600g283db571gacd0f8b7e4ddaf6@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jassisinghbrar-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=broonie-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).