Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: designware: Never suspend i2c-busses used for accessing the system PMIC

[Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>]

On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 11:32:45 +0100,
Hans de Goede wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 27-02-17 11:25, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 10:38:29 +0100,
> > Hans de Goede wrote:
> >>
> >> index a8e74ca..a4ac473 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h
> >> @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@
> >>   * @pm_qos: pm_qos_request used while holding a hardware lock on the bus
> >>   * @acquire_lock: function to acquire a hardware lock on the bus
> >>   * @release_lock: function to release a hardware lock on the bus
> >> - * @pm_runtime_disabled: true if pm runtime is disabled
> >> + * @pm_disabled: true if power-management should be disabled for this i2c-bus
> >>   *
> >>   * HCNT and LCNT parameters can be used if the platform knows more accurate
> >>   * values than the one computed based only on the input clock frequency.
> >> @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ struct dw_i2c_dev {
> >>  	struct pm_qos_request	pm_qos;
> >>  	int			(*acquire_lock)(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev);
> >>  	void			(*release_lock)(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev);
> >> -	bool			pm_runtime_disabled;
> >> +	bool			pm_disabled;
> >>  	bool			dynamic_tar_update_enabled;
> >
> > I couldn't find this dynamic_tar_update_enabled field in your previous
> > patchset.  What am I missing?
> 
> My testing branch for all this stuff is based on intel-drm-next-queued, which
> is still based on 4.10-rc$, and it seems that 4.11-rc1 will have this:
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit?id=12688dc21f71f4dcc9e2b8b5556b0c6cc8df1491
> 
> Removing the dynamic_tar_update_enabled member from that struct.
> 
> I will send out a new rebased version when 4.11-rc1 gets merged in
> intel-drm-next-queued.

Alright, thanks!

I'm testing the stuff right now.  Since I didn't have the issue on my
machine, I can't say whether it fixes or not.   But at least it
doesn't give any regression, so far ;)

I've put it to topic/i2c-dw-cherrytrail branch for anyone who wants to
try.


Takashi
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx