From: "Måns Rullgård" <mans@mansr.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: core: check returned size of emulated smbus block read
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 14:33:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <yw1x1rm2vtml.fsf@mansr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200626082208.GA4559@kunai> (Wolfram Sang's message of "Fri, 26 Jun 2020 10:22:08 +0200")
Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> writes:
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 11:41:09AM +0100, Mans Rullgard wrote:
>> If the i2c bus driver ignores the I2C_M_RECV_LEN flag (as some of
>> them do), it is possible for an I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_DATA read issued
>
> Out of interest, which driver did you use?
I saw it with the mv64xxx (Allwinner) and omap (Beaglebone) drivers.
From a quick look, it seems like quite a few others have the same
problem.
>> on some random device to return an arbitrary value in the first
>> byte (and nothing else).  When this happens, i2c_smbus_xfer_emulated()
>> will happily write past the end of the supplied data buffer, thus
>> causing Bad Things to happen.  To prevent this, check the size
>> before copying the data block and return an error if it is too large.
>
> Good catch, we were relying on the drivers too much here. I think the
> same fix is needed for the non-emulated case as well. Will have a look.
>
>> +			if (msg[1].buf[0] > I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX) {
>> +				dev_err(&adapter->dev,
>> +					"Invalid block size returned: %d\n",
>> +					msg[1].buf[0]);
>> +				status = -EINVAL;
>
> I changed this to -EPROTO as described in
> Documentation/i2c/fault-codes.rst.
>
> Applied to for-current, thanks!
>
-- 
Måns Rullgård
next prev parent reply	other threads:[~2020-06-26 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-13 10:41 [PATCH] i2c: core: check returned size of emulated smbus block read Mans Rullgard
2020-06-26  8:22 ` Wolfram Sang
2020-06-26 13:33   ` Måns Rullgård [this message]
2020-06-28 18:20     ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox
  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):
  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=yw1x1rm2vtml.fsf@mansr.com \
    --to=mans@mansr.com \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY
  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
  Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
  before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).