public inbox for linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	Conor Culhane <conor.culhane@silvaco.com>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org (moderated list:SILVACO I3C
	DUAL-ROLE MASTER), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
Cc: imx@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] i3c: master: svc: resend target address when get NACK
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 12:33:00 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240531163301.1401281-1-Frank.Li@nxp.com> (raw)

According to I3C Spec 1.1.1, 11-Jun-2021, section: 5.1.2.2.3:

If the Controller chooses to start an I3C Message with an I3C Dynamic
Address, then special provisions shall be made because that same I3C Target
may be initiating an IBI or a Controller Role Request. So, one of three
things may happen: (skip 1, 2)

3. The Addresses match and the RnW bits also match, and so neither
Controller nor Target will ACK since both are expecting the other side to
provide ACK. As a result, each side might think it had "won" arbitration,
but neither side would continue, as each would subsequently see that the
other did not provide ACK.
...
For either value of RnW: Due to the NACK, the Controller shall defer the
Private Write or Private Read, and should typically transmit the Target
						    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Address again after a Repeated START (i.e., the next one or any one prior
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
to a STOP in the Frame). Since the Address Header following a Repeated
START is not arbitrated, the Controller will always win (see Section
5.1.2.2.4).

Resend target address again if address is not 7E and controller get NACK.

Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
---
 drivers/i3c/master/svc-i3c-master.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i3c/master/svc-i3c-master.c b/drivers/i3c/master/svc-i3c-master.c
index 032fe032ec433..0b588ed5894ea 100644
--- a/drivers/i3c/master/svc-i3c-master.c
+++ b/drivers/i3c/master/svc-i3c-master.c
@@ -1052,29 +1052,59 @@ static int svc_i3c_master_xfer(struct svc_i3c_master *master,
 			       u8 *in, const u8 *out, unsigned int xfer_len,
 			       unsigned int *actual_len, bool continued)
 {
+	int retry = 2;
 	u32 reg;
 	int ret;
 
 	/* clean SVC_I3C_MINT_IBIWON w1c bits */
 	writel(SVC_I3C_MINT_IBIWON, master->regs + SVC_I3C_MSTATUS);
 
-	writel(SVC_I3C_MCTRL_REQUEST_START_ADDR |
-	       xfer_type |
-	       SVC_I3C_MCTRL_IBIRESP_NACK |
-	       SVC_I3C_MCTRL_DIR(rnw) |
-	       SVC_I3C_MCTRL_ADDR(addr) |
-	       SVC_I3C_MCTRL_RDTERM(*actual_len),
-	       master->regs + SVC_I3C_MCTRL);
 
-	ret = readl_poll_timeout(master->regs + SVC_I3C_MSTATUS, reg,
+	while (retry--) {
+		writel(SVC_I3C_MCTRL_REQUEST_START_ADDR |
+		       xfer_type |
+		       SVC_I3C_MCTRL_IBIRESP_NACK |
+		       SVC_I3C_MCTRL_DIR(rnw) |
+		       SVC_I3C_MCTRL_ADDR(addr) |
+		       SVC_I3C_MCTRL_RDTERM(*actual_len),
+		       master->regs + SVC_I3C_MCTRL);
+
+		ret = readl_poll_timeout(master->regs + SVC_I3C_MSTATUS, reg,
 				 SVC_I3C_MSTATUS_MCTRLDONE(reg), 0, 1000);
-	if (ret)
-		goto emit_stop;
+		if (ret)
+			goto emit_stop;
 
-	if (readl(master->regs + SVC_I3C_MERRWARN) & SVC_I3C_MERRWARN_NACK) {
-		ret = -ENXIO;
-		*actual_len = 0;
-		goto emit_stop;
+		if (readl(master->regs + SVC_I3C_MERRWARN) & SVC_I3C_MERRWARN_NACK) {
+			/*
+			 * According to I3C Spec 1.1.1, 11-Jun-2021, section: 5.1.2.2.3.
+			 * If the Controller chooses to start an I3C Message with an I3C Dynamic
+			 * Address, then special provisions shall be made because that same I3C
+			 * Target may be initiating an IBI or a Controller Role Request. So, one of
+			 * three things may happen: (skip 1, 2)
+			 *
+			 * 3. The Addresses match and the RnW bits also match, and so neither
+			 * Controller nor Target will ACK since both are expecting the other side to
+			 * provide ACK. As a result, each side might think it had "won" arbitration,
+			 * but neither side would continue, as each would subsequently see that the
+			 * other did not provide ACK.
+			 * ...
+			 * For either value of RnW: Due to the NACK, the Controller shall defer the
+			 * Private Write or Private Read, and should typically transmit the Target
+			 * Address again after a Repeated START (i.e., the next one or any one prior
+			 * to a STOP in the Frame). Since the Address Header following a Repeated
+			 * START is not arbitrated, the Controller will always win (see Section
+			 * 5.1.2.2.4).
+			 */
+			if (retry && addr != 0x7e) {
+				writel(SVC_I3C_MERRWARN_NACK, master->regs + SVC_I3C_MERRWARN);
+			} else {
+				ret = -ENXIO;
+				*actual_len = 0;
+				goto emit_stop;
+			}
+		} else {
+			break;
+		}
 	}
 
 	/*
-- 
2.34.1


-- 
linux-i3c mailing list
linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-i3c

             reply	other threads:[~2024-05-31 16:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-31 16:33 Frank Li [this message]
2024-06-03 14:00 ` [PATCH 1/1] i3c: master: svc: resend target address when get NACK Miquel Raynal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240531163301.1401281-1-Frank.Li@nxp.com \
    --to=frank.li@nxp.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=conor.culhane@silvaco.com \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox