From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9CE4CCD183 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2025 21:10:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=7L5f3KfgIQtzdS9IrW2MiDUOtPZP9Z1T2XOvR6oKfA4=; b=SIJf3+uGbKiION yZNRtEi/offCARHgzZboXgZM1uuKlSfyFeyW1SSnLLpDk9T78iR9DISawlF4T3u8/QPDmawZ0Ikyu P4uTcM0xnAe0OTZaiWSdLeGdBFqOaVpvx8NFakmIt7efbTyP8/Px/y1kIy9a7doozhf9lyTvo+9a2 UzjhDbNVhEnmQ60OJhx+dAh3KzrnicU4G+yYWW7FQwLWM/TrFfjNyFyGfMbzSRJMEjB18dEivaPn2 zAv0tAICBCglaAHiEaMIVw+duojEKjcQJ5d0yW2DVUSY3a07XPmlKHuKfeqJK896fLdb6nkqnL0Nw j5OzRd4cZHT8bC+lUgOg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1v8PoL-0000000EWqh-1pc8; Mon, 13 Oct 2025 21:10:29 +0000 Received: from cssvr7.cse.ust.hk ([143.89.41.157] helo=cse.ust.hk) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1v8PoI-0000000EWoq-1Rix for linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 13 Oct 2025 21:10:28 +0000 Received: from DESKTOP-2SPVBES.localdomain ([58.82.196.128]) (authenticated bits=0) by cse.ust.hk (8.18.1/8.12.5) with ESMTPSA id 59DL9wVu3228979 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 14 Oct 2025 05:10:04 +0800 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=cse.ust.hk; s=arccse; t=1760389806; cv=none; b=tiBsDJT3xpj7NWQcJ2Wx4aXDez0vw6zBerp1NqMjBPswZvy2hk+UAqo45nk/6Gu7e0mOpaobW5uF/38warrrMDrleB6YECaNVww7fRs4PZ2MUFCGxI2NFHEEUZSuDJhjeB7Lg9leOOZ8AWS+SQrLKqA4KbMm0RIoEhHdjuzN9cU= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=cse.ust.hk; s=arccse; t=1760389806; c=relaxed/relaxed; bh=e/fVirX4xMT9IBEC+zKmVYCyiBDldGxqIaba+5fYEZo=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=DC68Dvyn325nDN+Fjeamkvvqytq3l4oj2hn4YrR/Wdk6RBxPVp34sGZgElFPKJpcDGwMZVvD41SD2gqsIoRR6uRwsJghrLpjCw8CgZtRAvCa7YJIr6AweQHs4R36tgfD2zZMotmzVwzzThls1lZRx095L/8iG3UfvbKqO9rE1mU= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; cse.ust.hk DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cse.ust.hk; s=cseusthk; t=1760389805; bh=e/fVirX4xMT9IBEC+zKmVYCyiBDldGxqIaba+5fYEZo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=VNxXJi0Omgl029cLUyH3h4I8MKEAn4U8lbj6yvZPfwLxFtdrlnCu9/ZR+7wWCyJZz 2YoZj71PhQiEiOXYnJCBUpnoF7dWFF0CSbqvxycAWrwuS4oQ8fu160vjrJo9Z8qksJ 0nkx7ZrZ/4zk6r78/rYoDJsExyVl1G7piNgnsGF4= Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 05:09:53 +0800 From: Shuhao Fu To: Frank Li Cc: Alexandre Belloni , linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] i3c: fix refcount inconsistency in i3c_master_register Message-ID: <20251013210953.GA2124@DESKTOP-2SPVBES.localdomain> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Env-From: sfual X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20251013_141027_019591_66BA03A8 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 29.49 ) X-BeenThere: linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-i3c" Errors-To: linux-i3c-bounces+linux-i3c=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 04:19:00PM -0400, Frank Li wrote: > On Fri, Oct 10, 2025 at 02:34:08PM +0800, Shuhao Fu wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 09, 2025 at 12:17:11PM -0400, Frank Li wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 08, 2025 at 03:27:09PM +0800, Shuhao Fu wrote: > > > > In `i3c_master_register`, a possible refcount inconsistency has been > > > > identified, causing possible resource leak. > > > > > > > > Function `of_node_get` increases the refcount of `parent->of_node`. If > > > > function `i3c_bus_init` fails, the function returns immediately without > > > > a corresponding decrease, resulting in an inconsistent refcounter. > > > > > > > > In this patch, an extra goto label is added to ensure the balance of > > > > refcount when `i3c_bus_init` fails. > > > > > > > > Fixes: 3a379bbcea0a ("i3c: Add core I3C infrastructure") > > > > Signed-off-by: Shuhao Fu > > > > --- > > > > drivers/i3c/master.c | 5 ++++- > > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/i3c/master.c b/drivers/i3c/master.c > > > > index d946db75d..9f4fe98d2 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/i3c/master.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/i3c/master.c > > > > @@ -2885,7 +2885,7 @@ int i3c_master_register(struct i3c_master_controller *master, > > > > > > > > ret = i3c_bus_init(i3cbus, master->dev.of_node); > > > > if (ret) > > > > - return ret; > > > > + goto err_put_of_node; > > > > > > I think it'd better to set release function for master dev to release > > > of_node because of_node_put() also missed at i3c_master_unregister() > > > > > > you can refer drivers/base/platform.c > > > > > > Frank > > > > Do you mean that we should do `of_node_release` in > > `platform_device_release`, instead of respecting the refcounting via > > `of_node_put`? > > Sorry, I checked code again. > > static void i3c_masterdev_release(struct device *dev) > { > ... > of_node_put(dev->of_node); > } > > i3c_master_register() > { > ... > master->dev.release = i3c_masterdev_release; > ... > }; > > Suppose of_node_put() will be auto called when put_device(&master->dev); > > Do you really meet the problem or just static anaysis? > > Frank Honestly, it's from static analysis. My apologies for overlooking the release handle. I checked the code once again. It still looks suspicious as it would not call `put_device` if it fails. I also checked call sites related to `i3c_master_register` and they dont seem to do the clean-up if register fails. Shuhao > > > > > > > > > > > > > device_initialize(&master->dev); > > > > dev_set_name(&master->dev, "i3c-%d", i3cbus->id); > > > > @@ -2973,6 +2973,9 @@ int i3c_master_register(struct i3c_master_controller *master, > > > > err_put_dev: > > > > put_device(&master->dev); > > > > > > > > +err_put_of_node: > > > > + of_node_put(master->dev.of_node); > > > > + > > > > return ret; > > > > } > > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i3c_master_register); > > > > -- > > > > 2.39.5 (Apple Git-154) > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > linux-i3c mailing list > > > > linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org > > > > https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.infradead.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Flinux-i3c&data=05%7C02%7Csfual%40connect.ust.hk%7C837a825f1f3443950e6a08de0a95cb5f%7C6c1d415239d044ca88d9b8d6ddca0708%7C1%7C0%7C638959835659671475%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=B0ZvY%2FDKW3VdG%2FVamjGUUg%2BVr%2BZbtHIf4otgBKhje1s%3D&reserved=0 > > > > -- > > linux-i3c mailing list > > linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org > > https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.infradead.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Flinux-i3c&data=05%7C02%7Csfual%40connect.ust.hk%7C837a825f1f3443950e6a08de0a95cb5f%7C6c1d415239d044ca88d9b8d6ddca0708%7C1%7C0%7C638959835659696068%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=KpMM%2FsTa6G1o3q%2Bcqx6iTb3VbCDq723lCXgcA9GGetI%3D&reserved=0 -- linux-i3c mailing list linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-i3c