From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Claudiu Beznea" <claudiu.beznea@kernel.org>
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org, linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/16] i3c: renesas: Follow the reset deassert order used in probe
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2026 16:17:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260612161735.153001F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260612160458.3102106-4-claudiu.beznea@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] In `renesas_i3c_i2c_xfers`, unhandled timeouts cause the loop to proceed, risking data corruption and silent failures.
- [High] In `renesas_i3c_i3c_xfers`, transfer statuses and errors are completely ignored, unconditionally returning 0.
- [High] Missing hardware abort sequence on transfer timeout risks controller lockup.
--
commit 85523970e99a91763d831b25e5f1d70eaf5d402f
Author: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>
i3c: renesas: Follow the reset deassert order used in probe
Use the same reset deassert order in the resume and probe paths to avoid
potential failures due to ordering differences.
> diff --git a/drivers/i3c/master/renesas-i3c.c b/drivers/i3c/master/renesas-i3c.c
> index e70db3a17bc72..7d448936b74c1 100644
> --- a/drivers/i3c/master/renesas-i3c.c
> +++ b/drivers/i3c/master/renesas-i3c.c
> @@ -1457,17 +1457,17 @@ static int renesas_i3c_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
> struct renesas_i3c *i3c = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> int i, ret;
>
> - ret = reset_control_deassert(i3c->presetn);
> + ret = reset_control_deassert(i3c->tresetn);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
[ ... ]
While reviewing this file, I noticed a few pre-existing issues that might need
your attention:
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this code properly handle timeouts
during I2C transfers?
drivers/i3c/master/renesas-i3c.c:renesas_i3c_i2c_xfers() {
...
renesas_set_bit(i3c->regs, NTSTE, NTSTE_TDBEE0);
wait_for_completion_timeout(&xfer->comp, m->i2c.timeout);
if (cmd->err)
break;
start_bit = CNDCTL_SRCND;
...
}
If wait_for_completion_timeout() times out, its return value is discarded and
cmd->err remains 0. The loop condition if (cmd->err) break; does not trigger,
and the loop proceeds to the next iteration.
Can this overwrite shared state and issue a new START condition while the
hardware might still be processing the previous request? This could lead to
silent failures and controller desynchronization since the function eventually
returns success despite the timeout.
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does renesas_i3c_i3c_xfers() ignore hardware
errors and timeouts?
drivers/i3c/master/renesas-i3c.c:renesas_i3c_i3c_xfers() {
...
if (!i3c_xfers[i].rnw && i3c_xfers[i].len > 4) {
i3c_writel_fifo(i3c->regs + NTDTBP0, cmd->tx_buf, cmd->len);
if (cmd->len > NTDTBP0_DEPTH * sizeof(u32))
renesas_set_bit(i3c->regs, NTIE, NTIE_TDBEIE0);
}
renesas_i3c_wait_xfer(i3c, xfer);
}
return 0;
}
The loop iterates over i3c_nxfers and waits for each transfer using
renesas_i3c_wait_xfer(), but completely ignores xfer->ret which is populated
by the ISR with actual hardware error statuses like NACK or parity errors.
The function then unconditionally returns 0. Could masking all hardware errors
and timeouts from the upper layers lead to subsequent silent failures?
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but is there a missing hardware abort sequence
when a transfer times out?
drivers/i3c/master/renesas-i3c.c:renesas_i3c_wait_xfer() {
...
static void renesas_i3c_wait_xfer(struct renesas_i3c *i3c, struct renesas_i3c_xfer *xfer)
{
unsigned long time_left;
renesas_i3c_enqueue_xfer(i3c, xfer);
time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&xfer->comp, msecs_to_jiffies(1000));
if (!time_left)
renesas_i3c_dequeue_xfer(i3c, xfer);
}
...
}
When a transfer times out, the software state is dequeued via
renesas_i3c_dequeue_xfer(). However, it does not appear to set the BCTL_ABT
bit or reset the controller, leaving the hardware in an indeterminate busy
state.
When the next transfer is enqueued, renesas_i3c_start_xfer_locked()
indiscriminately writes new commands to the hardware command queue (NCMDQP).
Could this cause a bus collision or controller lockup?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260612160458.3102106-1-claudiu.beznea@kernel.org?part=3
--
linux-i3c mailing list
linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-i3c
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-12 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-12 16:04 [PATCH v4 00/16] i3c: renesas: Suspend to RAM with power loss and runtime PM Claudiu Beznea
2026-06-12 16:04 ` [PATCH v4 01/16] i3c: renesas: Check that the transfer is valid before accessing it Claudiu Beznea
2026-06-12 16:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 16:04 ` [PATCH v4 02/16] i3c: renesas: Restore STDBR and EXTBR registers on resume Claudiu Beznea
2026-06-12 16:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 16:04 ` [PATCH v4 03/16] i3c: renesas: Follow the reset deassert order used in probe Claudiu Beznea
2026-06-12 16:17 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-12 16:04 ` [PATCH v4 04/16] i3c: renesas: Reconfigure the DATBAS register on re-attach Claudiu Beznea
2026-06-12 16:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 16:04 ` [PATCH v4 05/16] i3c: renesas: Reset the controller on resume Claudiu Beznea
2026-06-12 16:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 16:04 ` [PATCH v4 06/16] i3c: renesas: Perform Dynamic Address Assignment " Claudiu Beznea
2026-06-12 16:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 16:04 ` [PATCH v4 07/16] i3c: renesas: Clean DATBAS register on detach Claudiu Beznea
2026-06-12 16:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 16:04 ` [PATCH v4 08/16] i3c: renesas: Use reset_control_bulk_{assert, deassert}() Claudiu Beznea
2026-06-12 16:04 ` [PATCH v4 09/16] i3c: renesas: Return immediately if there is no transfer Claudiu Beznea
2026-06-12 16:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 16:04 ` [PATCH v4 10/16] i3c: renesas: Follow a unified pattern for transfer and command initialization Claudiu Beznea
2026-06-12 16:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 16:04 ` [PATCH v4 11/16] i3c: renesas: Drop the explicit memset() call Claudiu Beznea
2026-06-12 16:04 ` [PATCH v4 12/16] i3c: renesas: Update HW registers after SW computations are done Claudiu Beznea
2026-06-12 16:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 16:04 ` [PATCH v4 13/16] i3c: renesas: Organize structures to avoid unnecessary padding Claudiu Beznea
2026-06-12 16:04 ` [PATCH v4 14/16] i3c: renesas: Use the "dev_name:irq_name" format for the interrupt name Claudiu Beznea
2026-06-12 16:04 ` [PATCH v4 15/16] i3c: renesas: Drop unnecessary tab Claudiu Beznea
2026-06-12 16:04 ` [PATCH v4 16/16] i3c: renesas: Add runtime PM support Claudiu Beznea
2026-06-12 16:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 20:17 ` [PATCH v4 00/16] i3c: renesas: Suspend to RAM with power loss and runtime PM Frank Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260612161735.153001F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=claudiu.beznea@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox