From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Adrian Hunter" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org,
"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/8] i3c: master: Fix recursive locking during device registration
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 16:19:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260728161935.C236F1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260728155308.142713-2-adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] Dropping the bus maintenance lock around device_register() exposes i3c_device_uevent() and driver probe functions to a Use-After-Free if a concurrent DAA replaces the device.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] i3c_device_uevent() leaks uninitialized stack memory to userspace when i3cdev->desc is NULL.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH V2 1/8] i3c: master: Fix recursive locking during device registration ---
commit 33a4dcd6c5626faef95bc7cd02ec4c56c6710c78
Author: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
i3c: master: Fix recursive locking during device registration
This commit separates device creation from registration to fix a recursive
locking issue. It drops the bus maintenance lock around device_register()
to prevent deadlocks when probe callbacks invoke I3C helpers.
diff --git a/drivers/i3c/master.c b/drivers/i3c/master.c
index fd3e79d10c840..874f6e11b296d 100644
--- a/drivers/i3c/master.c
+++ b/drivers/i3c/master.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1999,25 +2008,37 @@ i3c_master_register_new_i3c_devs(struct i3c_master_controller *master)
> if (desc->boardinfo)
> desc->dev->dev.of_node = desc->boardinfo->of_node;
>
> - ret = device_register(&desc->dev->dev);
> - if (ret) {
> - dev_err(&master->dev,
> - "Failed to add I3C device (err = %d)\n", ret);
> - desc->dev->desc = NULL;
> - put_device(&desc->dev->dev);
> - desc->dev = NULL;
> - }
> + list_add_tail(&desc->dev->node, &i3c_unreg_devs);
> + }
> +
> + i3c_bus_maintenance_unlock(&master->bus);
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(i3cdev, tmp, &i3c_unreg_devs, node) {
> + ret = device_register(&i3cdev->dev);
[Severity: High]
Does dropping the maintenance lock around device_register() expose
i3c_device_uevent() and driver probes to a use-after-free?
If a concurrent I3C hot-join event or a sysfs write to do_daa occurs while
device_register() is running without the lock,
__i3c_master_add_i3c_dev_locked() could find a duplicate PID:
__i3c_master_add_i3c_dev_locked() {
olddev = i3c_master_search_i3c_dev_duplicate(newdev);
if (olddev) {
newdev->dev = olddev->dev;
if (newdev->dev)
newdev->dev->desc = newdev;
...
i3c_master_detach_i3c_dev(olddev);
i3c_master_free_i3c_dev(olddev);
}
}
Meanwhile, device_register() triggers a KOBJ_ADD uevent. i3c_device_uevent()
reads i3cdev->desc locklessly:
i3c_device_uevent() {
if (i3cdev->desc)
devinfo = i3cdev->desc->info;
}
Could this lead to i3c_device_uevent() or driver probe functions dereferencing
the old descriptor while it is being freed?
> + if (ret)
> + dev_err(&master->dev, "Failed to add I3C device (err = %d)\n", ret);
> + else
> + list_del_init(&i3cdev->node);
> + }
> +
> + i3c_bus_maintenance_lock(&master->bus);
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(i3cdev, tmp, &i3c_unreg_devs, node) {
> + list_del(&i3cdev->node);
> + desc = i3cdev->desc;
> + i3cdev->desc = NULL;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does setting i3cdev->desc to NULL before
unregistration or cleanup lead to leaking uninitialized stack memory in
i3c_device_uevent()?
When a device is unregistered (or if registration fails and triggers a uevent),
i3cdev->desc is set to NULL. This bypasses the initialization of devinfo
in i3c_device_uevent():
i3c_device_uevent() {
struct i3c_device_info devinfo;
u16 manuf, part, ext;
if (i3cdev->desc)
devinfo = i3cdev->desc->info;
manuf = I3C_PID_MANUF_ID(devinfo.pid);
...
return add_uevent_var(env, "MODALIAS=i3c:dcr%02Xmanuf%04X",
devinfo.dcr, manuf);
}
Since devinfo is uninitialized on the stack when desc is NULL, could this
broadcast uninitialized kernel stack data to userspace processes listening
to netlink uevents?
> + put_device(&i3cdev->dev);
> + desc->dev = NULL;
> }
> +
> + i3c_bus_maintenance_unlock(&master->bus);
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260728155308.142713-1-adrian.hunter@intel.com?part=1
--
linux-i3c mailing list
linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-i3c
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-28 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-28 15:53 [PATCH V2 0/8] i3c: Support IBI-based system wakeup Adrian Hunter
2026-07-28 15:53 ` [PATCH V2 1/8] i3c: master: Fix recursive locking during device registration Adrian Hunter
2026-07-28 16:19 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-28 15:53 ` [PATCH V2 2/8] i3c: master: Support IBI-based wakeup capability Adrian Hunter
2026-07-28 16:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 15:53 ` [PATCH V2 3/8] i3c: master: Report wakeup events for IBIs Adrian Hunter
2026-07-28 16:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 15:53 ` [PATCH V2 4/8] i3c: master: Add helper to query bus wakeup requirements Adrian Hunter
2026-07-28 16:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 15:53 ` [PATCH V2 5/8] i3c: master: Reject IBI requests from non-IBI-capable devices Adrian Hunter
2026-07-28 17:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 15:53 ` [PATCH V2 6/8] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci-pci: Propagate I3C wakeup requirements to PCI Adrian Hunter
2026-07-28 17:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 15:53 ` [PATCH V2 7/8] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Factor out i3c_hci_sysdev() Adrian Hunter
2026-07-28 17:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 15:53 ` [PATCH V2 8/8] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Advertise IBI wakeup capability Adrian Hunter
2026-07-28 17:25 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260728161935.C236F1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox