From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Adrian Hunter" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org, linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org,
"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 03/14] i3c: master: Do not treat master device as a duplicate target
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2026 13:40:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260806134019.44A591F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260806131857.119830-4-adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Concurrent sysfs access during controller unregistration causes Use-After-Free on master->this.
--
--- Patch [3]: [PATCH V4 03/14] i3c: master: Do not treat master device as a duplicate target ---
commit fc7734e8f0ca4a890942ede6fbf8e3880e33f59c
Author: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
i3c: master: Do not treat master device as a duplicate target
i3c_master_search_i3c_dev_duplicate() searches the bus for another I3C
device with the same PID as the reference device. The search can match
master->this, causing the controller itself to be returned as a duplicate.
> diff --git a/drivers/i3c/master.c b/drivers/i3c/master.c
> index c7bb52b71d884..abb582645a2ed 100644
> --- a/drivers/i3c/master.c
> +++ b/drivers/i3c/master.c
> @@ -2545,7 +2545,8 @@ i3c_master_search_i3c_dev_duplicate(struct i3c_dev_desc *refdev)
>
> i3c_bus_for_each_i3cdev(&master->bus, i3cdev) {
> if (i3cdev != refdev && i3cdev->info.pid &&
> - i3cdev->info.pid == refdev->info.pid)
> + i3cdev->info.pid == refdev->info.pid &&
> + i3cdev != master->this)
> return i3cdev;
> }
>
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but since this patch modifies how master->this
is handled, I noticed a potential concurrent use-after-free with master->this
during unregistration.
When an I3C master controller is unregistered, i3c_master_unregister() calls
i3c_master_bus_cleanup() before device_unregister():
drivers/i3c/master.c:i3c_master_unregister() {
...
i3c_master_bus_cleanup(master);
pm_runtime_disable(&master->dev);
device_unregister(&master->dev);
...
}
The cleanup function eventually calls i3c_master_detach_free_devs(), which
unconditionally frees all devices in the bus list, including master->this:
drivers/i3c/master.c:i3c_master_detach_free_devs() {
...
i3c_master_free_i3c_dev(i3cdev);
...
}
Because device_unregister() has not yet executed, sysfs attributes attached
to the master device remain active.
If userspace reads a sysfs attribute during this window, would bcr_show()
dereference the freed master->this pointer?
drivers/i3c/master.c:bcr_show() {
...
desc = dev_to_i3cdesc(dev);
ret = sysfs_emit(buf, "0x%02x\n", desc->info.bcr);
...
}
The teardown path does not appear to hold the bus->lock, so the
i3c_bus_normaluse_lock() in the sysfs handler would still succeed. Could this
cause a memory corruption or information leak?
Should device_unregister() or sysfs attribute removal happen before the bus
is cleaned up and the devices are freed?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260806131857.119830-1-adrian.hunter@intel.com?part=3
--
linux-i3c mailing list
linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-i3c
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-06 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-06 13:18 [PATCH V4 00/14] i3c: Support IBI-based system wakeup Adrian Hunter
2026-08-06 13:18 ` [PATCH V4 01/14] i3c: master: Fix recursive locking during device registration Adrian Hunter
2026-08-06 13:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 16:46 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-06 18:24 ` Frank Li
2026-08-06 13:18 ` [PATCH V4 02/14] i3c: Fix unlocked dereference of dev->desc in i3c_device_get_supported_xfer_mode() Adrian Hunter
2026-08-06 13:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 18:26 ` Frank Li
2026-08-06 13:18 ` [PATCH V4 03/14] i3c: master: Do not treat master device as a duplicate target Adrian Hunter
2026-08-06 13:40 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-06 13:18 ` [PATCH V4 04/14] i3c: master: Fix use-after-free of master->this Adrian Hunter
2026-08-06 13:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 18:30 ` Frank Li
2026-08-06 13:18 ` [PATCH V4 05/14] i3c: Make dev->desc locking assumptions explicit Adrian Hunter
2026-08-06 13:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 18:31 ` Frank Li
2026-08-06 13:18 ` [PATCH V4 06/14] i3c: master: Fix potential UAF in i3c_device_uevent() Adrian Hunter
2026-08-06 13:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 18:33 ` Frank Li
2026-08-06 13:18 ` [PATCH V4 07/14] i3c: master: Fix potential UAF in i3c_device_match() Adrian Hunter
2026-08-06 13:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 17:13 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-06 13:18 ` [PATCH V4 08/14] i3c: master: Support IBI-based wakeup capability Adrian Hunter
2026-08-06 13:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 18:58 ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-06 13:18 ` [PATCH V4 09/14] i3c: master: Report wakeup events for IBIs Adrian Hunter
2026-08-06 13:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 17:16 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-06 18:35 ` Frank Li
2026-08-06 13:18 ` [PATCH V4 10/14] i3c: master: Add helper to query bus wakeup requirements Adrian Hunter
2026-08-06 13:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 18:46 ` Frank Li
2026-08-06 19:03 ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-06 13:18 ` [PATCH V4 11/14] i3c: master: Reject IBI requests from non-IBI-capable devices Adrian Hunter
2026-08-06 13:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 13:18 ` [PATCH V4 12/14] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci-pci: Propagate I3C wakeup requirements to PCI Adrian Hunter
2026-08-06 13:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 17:20 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-06 18:42 ` Frank Li
2026-08-06 13:18 ` [PATCH V4 13/14] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Factor out i3c_hci_sysdev() Adrian Hunter
2026-08-06 13:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 18:44 ` Frank Li
2026-08-06 19:07 ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-06 13:18 ` [PATCH V4 14/14] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Advertise IBI wakeup capability Adrian Hunter
2026-08-06 13:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 17:37 ` Adrian Hunter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260806134019.44A591F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox