Linux-i3c Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Adrian Hunter" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org, linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org,
	"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 03/14] i3c: master: Do not treat master device as a duplicate target
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2026 13:40:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260806134019.44A591F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260806131857.119830-4-adrian.hunter@intel.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Concurrent sysfs access during controller unregistration causes Use-After-Free on master->this.
--

--- Patch [3]: [PATCH V4 03/14] i3c: master: Do not treat master device as a duplicate target ---
commit fc7734e8f0ca4a890942ede6fbf8e3880e33f59c
Author: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>

i3c: master: Do not treat master device as a duplicate target

i3c_master_search_i3c_dev_duplicate() searches the bus for another I3C
device with the same PID as the reference device. The search can match
master->this, causing the controller itself to be returned as a duplicate.

> diff --git a/drivers/i3c/master.c b/drivers/i3c/master.c
> index c7bb52b71d884..abb582645a2ed 100644
> --- a/drivers/i3c/master.c
> +++ b/drivers/i3c/master.c
> @@ -2545,7 +2545,8 @@ i3c_master_search_i3c_dev_duplicate(struct i3c_dev_desc *refdev)
>  
>  	i3c_bus_for_each_i3cdev(&master->bus, i3cdev) {
>  		if (i3cdev != refdev && i3cdev->info.pid &&
> -		    i3cdev->info.pid == refdev->info.pid)
> +		    i3cdev->info.pid == refdev->info.pid &&
> +		    i3cdev != master->this)
>  			return i3cdev;
>  	}
>  

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but since this patch modifies how master->this
is handled, I noticed a potential concurrent use-after-free with master->this
during unregistration.

When an I3C master controller is unregistered, i3c_master_unregister() calls
i3c_master_bus_cleanup() before device_unregister():

drivers/i3c/master.c:i3c_master_unregister() {
	...
	i3c_master_bus_cleanup(master);
	pm_runtime_disable(&master->dev);
	device_unregister(&master->dev);
	...
}

The cleanup function eventually calls i3c_master_detach_free_devs(), which
unconditionally frees all devices in the bus list, including master->this:

drivers/i3c/master.c:i3c_master_detach_free_devs() {
	...
		i3c_master_free_i3c_dev(i3cdev);
	...
}

Because device_unregister() has not yet executed, sysfs attributes attached
to the master device remain active. 

If userspace reads a sysfs attribute during this window, would bcr_show() 
dereference the freed master->this pointer?

drivers/i3c/master.c:bcr_show() {
	...
	desc = dev_to_i3cdesc(dev);
	ret = sysfs_emit(buf, "0x%02x\n", desc->info.bcr);
	...
}

The teardown path does not appear to hold the bus->lock, so the
i3c_bus_normaluse_lock() in the sysfs handler would still succeed. Could this
cause a memory corruption or information leak?

Should device_unregister() or sysfs attribute removal happen before the bus
is cleaned up and the devices are freed?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260806131857.119830-1-adrian.hunter@intel.com?part=3

-- 
linux-i3c mailing list
linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-i3c

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-06 13:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-06 13:18 [PATCH V4 00/14] i3c: Support IBI-based system wakeup Adrian Hunter
2026-08-06 13:18 ` [PATCH V4 01/14] i3c: master: Fix recursive locking during device registration Adrian Hunter
2026-08-06 13:39   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 16:46     ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-06 18:24   ` Frank Li
2026-08-06 13:18 ` [PATCH V4 02/14] i3c: Fix unlocked dereference of dev->desc in i3c_device_get_supported_xfer_mode() Adrian Hunter
2026-08-06 13:38   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 18:26   ` Frank Li
2026-08-06 13:18 ` [PATCH V4 03/14] i3c: master: Do not treat master device as a duplicate target Adrian Hunter
2026-08-06 13:40   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-06 13:18 ` [PATCH V4 04/14] i3c: master: Fix use-after-free of master->this Adrian Hunter
2026-08-06 13:39   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 18:30   ` Frank Li
2026-08-06 13:18 ` [PATCH V4 05/14] i3c: Make dev->desc locking assumptions explicit Adrian Hunter
2026-08-06 13:39   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 18:31   ` Frank Li
2026-08-06 13:18 ` [PATCH V4 06/14] i3c: master: Fix potential UAF in i3c_device_uevent() Adrian Hunter
2026-08-06 13:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 18:33   ` Frank Li
2026-08-06 13:18 ` [PATCH V4 07/14] i3c: master: Fix potential UAF in i3c_device_match() Adrian Hunter
2026-08-06 13:45   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 17:13     ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-06 13:18 ` [PATCH V4 08/14] i3c: master: Support IBI-based wakeup capability Adrian Hunter
2026-08-06 13:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 18:58   ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-06 13:18 ` [PATCH V4 09/14] i3c: master: Report wakeup events for IBIs Adrian Hunter
2026-08-06 13:49   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 17:16     ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-06 18:35   ` Frank Li
2026-08-06 13:18 ` [PATCH V4 10/14] i3c: master: Add helper to query bus wakeup requirements Adrian Hunter
2026-08-06 13:29   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 18:46   ` Frank Li
2026-08-06 19:03   ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-06 13:18 ` [PATCH V4 11/14] i3c: master: Reject IBI requests from non-IBI-capable devices Adrian Hunter
2026-08-06 13:41   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 13:18 ` [PATCH V4 12/14] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci-pci: Propagate I3C wakeup requirements to PCI Adrian Hunter
2026-08-06 13:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 17:20     ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-06 18:42   ` Frank Li
2026-08-06 13:18 ` [PATCH V4 13/14] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Factor out i3c_hci_sysdev() Adrian Hunter
2026-08-06 13:46   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 18:44   ` Frank Li
2026-08-06 19:07   ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-06 13:18 ` [PATCH V4 14/14] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Advertise IBI wakeup capability Adrian Hunter
2026-08-06 13:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 17:37     ` Adrian Hunter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260806134019.44A591F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox