Linux-i3c Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Adrian Hunter" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org,
	linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org,
	"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 05/14] i3c: Make dev->desc locking assumptions explicit
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2026 15:20:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260807152054.A05921F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260807145638.168865-6-adrian.hunter@intel.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Use-After-Free and potential information leak in `i3c_device_uevent()` due to missing locks during concurrent device descriptor replacement.
--

--- Patch [5]: [PATCH V5 05/14] i3c: Make dev->desc locking assumptions explicit ---
commit 278282a9eadd6c355b60a12ba9af4c6b5982e144
Author: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>

i3c: Make dev->desc locking assumptions explicit

This commit removes an unnecessary NULL pointer check in
i3c_device_get_info() since the descriptor pointer is guaranteed
valid under the bus normal-use lock.

> diff --git a/drivers/i3c/device.c b/drivers/i3c/device.c
> index a3778282e84c2..5e6df6de02834 100644
> --- a/drivers/i3c/device.c
> +++ b/drivers/i3c/device.c
> @@ -101,8 +101,7 @@ void i3c_device_get_info(const struct i3c_device *dev,
>  		return;
>  
>  	i3c_bus_normaluse_lock(dev->bus);
> -	if (dev->desc)
> -		*info = dev->desc->info;
> +	*info = dev->desc->info;
>  	i3c_bus_normaluse_unlock(dev->bus);

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the same locking rule need to be
applied to i3c_device_uevent() in drivers/i3c/master.c?

It appears that i3c_device_uevent() currently reads i3cdev->desc without
holding the normal-use bus lock:

drivers/i3c/master.c:i3c_device_uevent() {
        struct i3c_device_info devinfo;
        ...
        if (i3cdev->desc)
                devinfo = i3cdev->desc->info;
        ...
}

Could this sequence cause a use-after-free if a concurrent device discovery
or hot-join occurs? For example, if __i3c_master_add_i3c_dev_locked() 
replaces and frees the descriptor while the device is still accessible 
via sysfs uevents:

drivers/i3c/master.c:__i3c_master_add_i3c_dev_locked() {
        ...
        i3c_master_detach_i3c_dev(olddev);
        i3c_master_free_i3c_dev(olddev);
        ...
}

Also, if i3cdev->desc evaluates to NULL during the uevent, could this
leave the devinfo stack variable uninitialized and expose kernel stack
memory to user space via the modalias string?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260807145638.168865-1-adrian.hunter@intel.com?part=5

-- 
linux-i3c mailing list
linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-i3c

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-07 15:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-07 14:56 [PATCH V5 00/14] i3c: Support IBI-based system wakeup Adrian Hunter
2026-08-07 14:56 ` [PATCH V5 01/14] i3c: master: Fix recursive locking during device registration Adrian Hunter
2026-08-07 15:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 14:56 ` [PATCH V5 02/14] i3c: Fix unlocked dereference of dev->desc in i3c_device_get_supported_xfer_mode() Adrian Hunter
2026-08-07 15:13   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 14:56 ` [PATCH V5 03/14] i3c: master: Do not treat master device as a duplicate target Adrian Hunter
2026-08-07 15:07   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 14:56 ` [PATCH V5 04/14] i3c: master: Fix use-after-free of master->this Adrian Hunter
2026-08-07 15:14   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 14:56 ` [PATCH V5 05/14] i3c: Make dev->desc locking assumptions explicit Adrian Hunter
2026-08-07 15:20   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-07 14:56 ` [PATCH V5 06/14] i3c: master: Fix potential UAF in i3c_device_uevent() Adrian Hunter
2026-08-07 15:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 14:56 ` [PATCH V5 07/14] i3c: master: Fix potential UAF in i3c_device_match() Adrian Hunter
2026-08-07 15:37   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 19:43   ` Frank Li
2026-08-08 13:07     ` Alexandre Belloni
2026-08-07 14:56 ` [PATCH V5 08/14] i3c: master: Support IBI-based wakeup capability Adrian Hunter
2026-08-07 15:16   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 14:56 ` [PATCH V5 09/14] i3c: master: Report wakeup events for IBIs Adrian Hunter
2026-08-07 15:41   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 14:56 ` [PATCH V5 10/14] i3c: master: Add helper to query bus wakeup requirements Adrian Hunter
2026-08-07 15:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 14:56 ` [PATCH V5 11/14] i3c: master: Reject IBI requests from non-IBI-capable devices Adrian Hunter
2026-08-07 15:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 14:56 ` [PATCH V5 12/14] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci-pci: Propagate I3C wakeup requirements to PCI Adrian Hunter
2026-08-07 15:38   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 14:56 ` [PATCH V5 13/14] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Factor out i3c_hci_sysdev() Adrian Hunter
2026-08-07 15:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 14:56 ` [PATCH V5 14/14] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Advertise IBI wakeup capability Adrian Hunter
2026-08-07 15:30   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 13:09 ` [PATCH V5 00/14] i3c: Support IBI-based system wakeup Alexandre Belloni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260807152054.A05921F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox