Linux-i3c Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ruoyu Wang" <ruoyuw560@gmail.com>
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org,
	"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i3c: master: Release I2C boardinfo node reference
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 13:58:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260814135841.2772F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260814134027.1386818-1-ruoyuw560@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Use-After-Free and Double-Free on I3C device registration failure.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] i3c: master: Release I2C boardinfo node reference ---
commit fb94e3e139711c2723cb1a74b85c8a9c79efcfd3
Author: Ruoyu Wang <ruoyuw560@gmail.com>

i3c: master: Release I2C boardinfo node reference

The commit registers the board-info node reference as a managed resource
of the I3C master. This ensures the reference is properly retained for the
full lifetime of the board-info and released on both registration failure
and normal master teardown, preventing memory leaks.

> diff --git a/drivers/i3c/master.c b/drivers/i3c/master.c
> index f1be38a640ca1..8063e2642cbda 100644
> --- a/drivers/i3c/master.c
> +++ b/drivers/i3c/master.c

[ ... ]

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but while reviewing this file, I noticed a
potential use-after-free and double-free regression when handling I3C
device registration failures.

If device_register() fails in i3c_master_register_new_i3c_devs(), put_device()
is called to free desc->dev:

drivers/i3c/master.c:i3c_master_register_new_i3c_devs() {
    ...
		ret = device_register(&desc->dev->dev);
		if (ret) {
			dev_err(&master->dev,
				"Failed to add I3C device (err = %d)\n", ret);
			put_device(&desc->dev->dev);
		}
    ...
}

However, desc->dev is not set to NULL after being freed, leaving a dangling
pointer on the master's bus list.

If the master is later unregistered, i3c_master_unregister_i3c_devs() iterates
over the bus list and accesses this dangling pointer:

drivers/i3c/master.c:i3c_master_unregister_i3c_devs() {
    ...
	i3c_bus_for_each_i3cdev(&master->bus, i3cdev) {
		if (!i3cdev->dev)
			continue;

		i3cdev->dev->desc = NULL;
		if (device_is_registered(&i3cdev->dev->dev))
			device_unregister(&i3cdev->dev->dev);
		else
			put_device(&i3cdev->dev->dev);
		i3cdev->dev = NULL;
	}
    ...
}

Could this sequence lead to writing to freed memory when setting
i3cdev->dev->desc to NULL, followed by a double-free when put_device() is
called again?

Would it be safer to clear the desc->dev pointer in the error path of
i3c_master_register_new_i3c_devs() after the initial put_device() call?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260814134027.1386818-1-ruoyuw560@gmail.com?part=1

-- 
linux-i3c mailing list
linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-i3c

      reply	other threads:[~2026-08-14 13:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-14 13:40 [PATCH] i3c: master: Release I2C boardinfo node reference Ruoyu Wang
2026-08-14 13:58 ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260814135841.2772F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=ruoyuw560@gmail.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox