Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] dt-bindings: i3c: svc: add compatible string i3c: silvaco,i3c-target-v1

From: Frank Li <Frank.li@nxp.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com,
	conor.culhane@silvaco.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	imx@lists.linux.dev, jirislaby@kernel.org, joe@perches.com,
	linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, miquel.raynal@bootlin.com,
	zbigniew.lukwinski@linux.intel.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] dt-bindings: i3c: svc: add compatible string i3c: silvaco,i3c-target-v1
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 21:29:30 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZaXqCoCHPWER94Hh@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1b628901-7f71-4c97-9a16-723912988417@linaro.org>

On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 09:38:19PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 15/01/2024 20:44, Frank Li wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 11:06:01AM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 04:50:25PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>> On 12/01/2024 16:31, Frank Li wrote:
> >>>> I review previous comments. The previous RFC patches and I just want I3C
> >>>> expert review to check if there are comments about whole software
> >>>> architecture. Of course, thank you for your comments about "slave".
> >>>>
> >>>> Go back this binding doc problem. 
> >>>>
> >>>>   "No, it's the same device.
> >>>>
> >>>>    Anyway, this was not tested.
> >>>>
> >>>>    Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
> >>>>    and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older
> >>>>    kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base
> >>>>    your patches on recent Linux kernel.
> >>>>
> >>>>    You missed at least devicetree list (maybe more), so this won't be
> >>>>    tested by automated tooling. Performing review on untested code might be
> >>>>    a waste of time, thus I will skip this patch entirely till you follow
> >>>>    the process allowing the patch to be tested.
> >>>>
> >>>>    Please kindly resend and include all necessary To/Cc entries.
> >>>>    "
> >>>>
> >>>> It is the same devices, work at difference mode (master  and target).
> >>>> what's do you want to change to?
> >>>>
> >>>> Copy to new file like pci/pci-ep? all context is the same, except for
> >>>> compatible string. 
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Apologies, I mixed up a bit patches, so this was not obvious. I meant
> >>> this comment:
> >>>
> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231017201404.GA2570433-robh@kernel.org/
> >>>
> >>> There is no indication in your commit msg that these concerns were
> >>> addressed.
> >>
> >> Look like everyone already accecpted 'silvaco,i3c-master-v1'.
> >>
> >> driver part:
> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=8911eae9c8a947e5c1cc4fcce40473f1f5e475cd
> >> dts part:
> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=b8ec0f3b42a3498d5115d1fb1490082ab525747b
> > 
> > @Krzysztof:
> > 	Patches were accepted after discussion, what you ponit to. So I
> > think everyone agree on the name 'silvaco,i3c-master-v1'.
> > 	I plan send next version to fix auto build error. Any additional
> > comments about this?
> 
> I still do not see how did you address Rob's comment and his point is
> valid. You just did not reply to it.

See https://lore.kernel.org/imx/ZXCiaKfMYYShoiXK@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810/

Frank

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 

-- 
linux-i3c mailing list
linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-i3c