From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7FA9D68BF6 for ; Sat, 16 Nov 2024 21:59:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=Dy1TW+xst8peZpbrAHK1J2/aWI+MyRlSuGajAbqCEPs=; b=H9LY2bFsMtFkUE sa19vmbtDKeq9sQwTKkPgFP5F0liSkmIAjMZ/ThqkkaMdFZQVcH/pIGpfohpamO4Wm2PRwRi+PeDM IZ7MWR6EtaJvdJIJ4iCjjoDrOlrkOSvCkfzD5aD8pPkTul9A365bTSZmfHZ8g/AJqqedpyQp7EaWM mROII+X5ELzsZ8XZXOL3kOBJVnR3FZDud18D98T1MOQ4XnjAHlFeCXZR/MGob96E8llQ/pwnq18c/ S7wW6Jvr2TdmDkdaaoxUlxw6d+fJVDHT04D8MJ/xg0L+7Yy8ZmO9y7lfd/SrckNApl8N8b23n1Qe6 bmwGiKuEFJywjtSWwi0A==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tCQpf-00000006H0t-1W0O; Sat, 16 Nov 2024 21:59:55 +0000 Received: from mgamail.intel.com ([198.175.65.20]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tBEFl-000000076D0-2rCY for linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 14:21:54 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1731507714; x=1763043714; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=3DG3pVyaEIXykT94bHXydQtHV5qXoL01zSxkhQQgd14=; b=IBEZ4rEh3clcyIe0UCarNqsZjLpzXiOfnAysSo8OJuG9Ci+X32xESa1d r74Yx2f9gAH/bNI0NZ+k/XfopPrt/8Z6JdtbAg5IH4OCQqiK+kOcH2UbO h2dKBtPswFAoPACAgnL0G4Bse+zzocF2EtM3I+rjAPxhFCIbh4GKqQuoC nQV9UnZtk3VFDvTlND/IsMNQwJfDjauBZjjFiyBwvxR6AcmJfGHXZwV3H VWmeiEbLolimMXmqbMVMVo/8OKUrLWweGkQqaaNLekNn/I79Bhem8ekSE lkzExqHXCR7xjFYgaW32mR3lM4V69afJORkqOrz1aR3f1YfbygNxju0yw A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: EObHBsDiQkydqZ47wRejiA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: vdyiU2PtRNeIkBNLuu8c6Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11222"; a="31168887" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,199,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="31168887" Received: from orviesa007.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.147]) by orvoesa112.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Nov 2024 06:21:51 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: zG5i5Y+xS82ELxp6o8cMUQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Vth3UAT9QeiHxEQOl1OTXA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,151,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="88282446" Received: from kuha.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.152]) by orviesa007.jf.intel.com with SMTP; 13 Nov 2024 06:21:48 -0800 Received: by kuha.fi.intel.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 13 Nov 2024 16:21:46 +0200 Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 16:21:46 +0200 From: Heikki Krogerus To: Shyam Sundar S K Cc: Alexandre Belloni , Jarkko Nikula , Sanket.Goswami@amd.com, linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] i3c: master: Add ACPI support to i3c subsystem Message-ID: References: <20241108073323.523805-1-Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com> <20241108073323.523805-3-Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241108073323.523805-3-Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20241113_062153_796911_DA1647CA X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 32.01 ) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 16 Nov 2024 13:59:53 -0800 X-BeenThere: linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-i3c" Errors-To: linux-i3c-bounces+linux-i3c=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi, On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 01:03:20PM +0530, Shyam Sundar S K wrote: > As of now, the I3C subsystem only has ARM-specific initialization, and > there is no corresponding ACPI plumbing present. To address this, ACPI > support needs to be added to both the I3C core and DW driver. > > Add support to get the ACPI handle from the _HID probed and parse the apci > object to retrieve the slave information from BIOS. > > Based on the acpi object information propogated via BIOS, build the i3c > board information so that the same information can be used across the > driver to handle the slave requests. > > Co-developed-by: Sanket Goswami > Signed-off-by: Sanket Goswami > Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K > --- > Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org > > drivers/i3c/internals.h | 3 ++ > drivers/i3c/master.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/i3c/master/dw-i3c-master.c | 7 +++ > include/linux/i3c/master.h | 1 + > 4 files changed, 95 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/i3c/internals.h b/drivers/i3c/internals.h > index 433f6088b7ce..178bc0ebe6b6 100644 > --- a/drivers/i3c/internals.h > +++ b/drivers/i3c/internals.h > @@ -10,6 +10,9 @@ > > #include > > +#define I3C_GET_PID 0x08 > +#define I3C_GET_ADDR 0x7F > + > void i3c_bus_normaluse_lock(struct i3c_bus *bus); > void i3c_bus_normaluse_unlock(struct i3c_bus *bus); > > diff --git a/drivers/i3c/master.c b/drivers/i3c/master.c > index 6f3eb710a75d..0ceef2aa9161 100644 > --- a/drivers/i3c/master.c > +++ b/drivers/i3c/master.c > @@ -2251,6 +2251,84 @@ static int of_i3c_master_add_dev(struct i3c_master_controller *master, > return ret; > } > > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI) > +static int i3c_acpi_configure_master(struct i3c_master_controller *master) > +{ > + struct acpi_buffer buf = {ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL}; > + enum i3c_addr_slot_status addrstatus; > + struct i3c_dev_boardinfo *boardinfo; > + struct device *dev = &master->dev; > + struct fwnode_handle *fwnode; > + struct acpi_device *adev; > + u32 slv_addr, num_dev; > + acpi_status status; > + u64 val; > + > + status = acpi_evaluate_object_typed(master->ahandle, "_DSD", NULL, &buf, ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE); > + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) { > + dev_err(&master->dev, "Error reading _DSD:%s\n", acpi_format_exception(status)); > + return -ENODEV; > + } Why do you need to do that? > + num_dev = device_get_child_node_count(dev); > + if (!num_dev) { > + dev_err(&master->dev, "Error: no child node present\n"); > + return -EINVAL; > + } I think Jarkko already pointed out the problem with that. The whole check should be dropped. > + device_for_each_child_node(dev, fwnode) { > + adev = to_acpi_device_node(fwnode); > + if (!adev) > + return -ENODEV; > + > + status = acpi_evaluate_integer(adev->handle, "_ADR", NULL, &val); > + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) { > + dev_err(&master->dev, "Error: eval _ADR failed\n"); > + return -EINVAL; > + } val = acpi_device_adr(adev); > + slv_addr = val & I3C_GET_ADDR; > + > + boardinfo = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*boardinfo), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!boardinfo) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + if (slv_addr) { > + if (slv_addr > I3C_MAX_ADDR) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + addrstatus = i3c_bus_get_addr_slot_status(&master->bus, slv_addr); > + if (addrstatus != I3C_ADDR_SLOT_FREE) > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + boardinfo->static_addr = slv_addr; > + if (boardinfo->static_addr > I3C_MAX_ADDR) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + addrstatus = i3c_bus_get_addr_slot_status(&master->bus, boardinfo->static_addr); > + if (addrstatus != I3C_ADDR_SLOT_FREE) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + boardinfo->pid = val >> I3C_GET_PID; > + if ((boardinfo->pid & GENMASK_ULL(63, 48)) || > + I3C_PID_RND_LOWER_32BITS(boardinfo->pid)) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + /* > + * According to the specification, SETDASA is not supported for DIMM slaves > + * during device discovery. Therefore, BIOS will populate same initial > + * dynamic address as the static address. > + */ > + boardinfo->init_dyn_addr = boardinfo->static_addr; > + list_add_tail(&boardinfo->node, &master->boardinfo.i3c); > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > +#else > +static int i3c_acpi_configure_master(struct i3c_master_controller *master) { return 0; } > +#endif I think this code should be placed into a separate file. If the goal is to add ACPI support for code that is written for DT only, then I think the first thing to do before that really should be to convert the existing code to use the unified device property interface, and move all the DT-only parts to a separate file(s). thanks, -- heikki -- linux-i3c mailing list linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-i3c