From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: <sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev>
Cc: <linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org>, <Frank.Li@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] i3c: master: Update dev_nack_retry_count under maintenance lock
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 16:30:14 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bfc91b1a-c2ba-42e7-9625-dd0a795eb30e@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260616115145.EE9731F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
On 16/06/2026 14:51, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
>
> Pre-existing issues:
> - [High] Preexisting Use-After-Free (UAF) due to devres freeing the I3C master controller while its embedded `struct device` is still referenced.
> --
>
> commit d8d2b455dc4bd3d672311fc14258b4a9d0b83e8b
> Author: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
> Subject: i3c: master: Update dev_nack_retry_count under maintenance lock
>
> This commit protects master->dev_nack_retry_count against concurrent sysfs
> updates by updating it while holding the bus maintenance lock. It also
> combines adjacent return statements and updates the read path to hold the bus
> normaluse lock.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/i3c/master.c b/drivers/i3c/master.c
>> index 372d911ecbadc..05ea9e3c4d46f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/i3c/master.c
>> +++ b/drivers/i3c/master.c
>> @@ -744,7 +744,14 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(hotjoin);
>> static ssize_t dev_nack_retry_count_show(struct device *dev,
>> struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>> {
>> - return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", dev_to_i3cmaster(dev)->dev_nack_retry_count);
>> + struct i3c_bus *i3cbus = dev_to_i3cbus(dev);
>> + ssize_t ret;
>> +
>> + i3c_bus_normaluse_lock(i3cbus);
>> + ret = sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", dev_to_i3cmaster(dev)->dev_nack_retry_count);
>
> [Severity: High]
> This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but since we are modifying sysfs
> attributes here, is there a pre-existing use-after-free risk related to how
> the i3c_master_controller is allocated and freed?
>
> Many I3C master drivers (e.g., dw-i3c-master.c) allocate their driver context
> (which embeds struct i3c_master_controller) using devm_kzalloc(). During
> unbind/removal, device_unregister(&master->dev) is called, which drops the
> initial reference. If a user-space process holds a sysfs file open (like this
> dev_nack_retry_count attribute), or if an attacker blocks in a sysfs read or
> write using userfaultfd, the kobject reference count remains elevated.
>
> The driver's remove function then returns, and the devres framework
> automatically frees the driver context memory. Later, when the final reference
> is dropped, the driver core calls i3c_masterdev_release():
>
> drivers/i3c/master.c:i3c_masterdev_release() {
> struct i3c_master_controller *master = dev_to_i3cmaster(dev);
> struct i3c_bus *bus = dev_to_i3cbus(dev);
>
> if (master->wq)
> destroy_workqueue(master->wq);
> ...
> }
>
> Will this result in a use-after-free since the release function accesses the
> master struct after its memory has already been freed by devres?
No. Open sysfs files do not block device release. On the other hand,
driver remove is blocked if a driver sysfs callback is in progress.
--
linux-i3c mailing list
linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-i3c
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-16 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-16 11:37 [PATCH 0/3] i3c: master: Small fixes for dev_nack_retry_count Adrian Hunter
2026-06-16 11:37 ` [PATCH 1/3] i3c: master: Update dev_nack_retry_count under maintenance lock Adrian Hunter
2026-06-16 11:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 13:30 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2026-06-16 11:37 ` [PATCH 2/3] i3c: master: Add missing runtime PM get in dev_nack_retry_count_store() Adrian Hunter
2026-06-16 11:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 13:46 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-06-16 11:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] i3c: master: Use unsigned int for dev_nack_retry_count consistently Adrian Hunter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bfc91b1a-c2ba-42e7-9625-dd0a795eb30e@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox