public inbox for linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nuno Sá" <noname.nuno@gmail.com>
To: "Guntupalli, Manikanta" <manikanta.guntupalli@amd.com>,
	Jorge Marques <gastmaier@gmail.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	Jorge Marques	 <jorge.marques@analog.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
	 Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org"	 <linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org"	 <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"git (AMD-Xilinx)" <git@amd.com>,
	"Simek, Michal" <michal.simek@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v2] i3c: fix big-endian FIFO transfers
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 09:58:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e5a6789230840b31ef0f60ca0a770a4fb266da2a.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM4PR12MB61093CEE50990ECC403D3FB98C1FA@DM4PR12MB6109.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>

On Thu, 2025-09-25 at 08:47 +0000, Guntupalli, Manikanta wrote:
> [Public]
> 
> Hi,
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2025 1:22 PM
> > To: Guntupalli, Manikanta <manikanta.guntupalli@amd.com>; Jorge Marques
> > <gastmaier@gmail.com>; Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>; Jorge Marques
> > <jorge.marques@analog.com>; Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-
> > engineering.com>; Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>; Arnd Bergmann
> > <arnd@arndb.de>; linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org;
> > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; git
> > (AMD-Xilinx) <git@amd.com>; Simek, Michal <michal.simek@amd.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v2] i3c: fix big-endian FIFO transfers
> > 
> > On Thu, 2025-09-25 at 07:37 +0000, Guntupalli, Manikanta wrote:
> > > [Public]
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Jorge Marques <gastmaier@gmail.com>
> > > > Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2025 12:47 PM
> > > > To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
> > > > Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>; Jorge Marques
> > > > <jorge.marques@analog.com>; Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-
> > > > engineering.com>; Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>; Arnd Bergmann
> > > > <arnd@arndb.de>; Guntupalli, Manikanta
> > > > <manikanta.guntupalli@amd.com>;
> > > > linux-
> > > > i3c@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v2] i3c: fix big-endian FIFO transfers
> > > > 
> > > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 10:18:33PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > > > > 
> > > > > Short MMIO transfers that are not a multiple of four bytes in size
> > > > > need a special case for the final bytes, however the existing
> > > > > implementation is not endian-safe and introduces an incorrect
> > > > > byteswap on big-endian kernels.
> > > > > 
> > > > > This usually does not cause problems because most systems are
> > > > > little-endian and most transfers are multiple of four bytes long,
> > > > > but still needs to be fixed to avoid the extra byteswap.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Change the special case for both i3c_writel_fifo() and
> > > > > i3c_readl_fifo() to use non-byteswapping writesl() and readsl()
> > > > > with a single element instead of the byteswapping writel()/readl()
> > > > > that are meant for individual MMIO registers. As data is copied
> > > > > between a FIFO and a memory buffer, the writesl()/readsl() loops
> > > > > are typically based on __raw_readl()/ __raw_writel(), resulting in
> > > > > the order of bytes in the FIFO to match the order in the buffer,
> > > > > regardless of the CPU endianess.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The earlier versions in the dw-i3c and i3c-master-cdns had a
> > > > > correct implementation, but the generic version that was recently
> > > > > added broke
> > it.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Fixes: 733b439375b4 ("i3c: master: Add inline i3c_readl_fifo() and
> > > > > i3c_writel_fifo()")
> > > > > Cc: Manikanta Guntupalli <manikanta.guntupalli@amd.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > This was a recent regression, the version in 6.16 still works, but
> > > > > 6.17-rc is broken.
> > > > > 
> > > > > v2 changes:
> > > > >  - add code comments
> > > > >  - write correct data buffer
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  drivers/i3c/internals.h | 12 ++++++++++--
> > > > >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/i3c/internals.h b/drivers/i3c/internals.h
> > > > > index 0d857cc68cc5..79ceaa5f5afd 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/i3c/internals.h
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/i3c/internals.h
> > > > > @@ -38,7 +38,11 @@ static inline void i3c_writel_fifo(void __iomem
> > > > > *addr, const
> > > > void *buf,
> > > > >             u32 tmp = 0;
> > > > > 
> > > > >             memcpy(&tmp, buf + (nbytes & ~3), nbytes & 3);
> > > > > -           writel(tmp, addr);
> > > > > +           /*
> > > > > +            * writesl() instead of writel() to keep FIFO
> > > > > +            * byteorder on big-endian targets
> > > > > +            */
> > > > > +           writesl(addr, &tmp, 1);
> > > > >     }
> > > > >  }
> > > > > 
> > > > > @@ -55,7 +59,11 @@ static inline void i3c_readl_fifo(const void
> > > > > __iomem *addr,
> > > > void *buf,
> > > > >     if (nbytes & 3) {
> > > > >             u32 tmp;
> > > > > 
> > > > > -           tmp = readl(addr);
> > > > > +           /*
> > > > > +            * readsl() instead of readl() to keep FIFO
> > > > > +            * byteorder on big-endian targets
> > > > > +            */
> > > > > +           readsl(addr, &tmp, 1);
> > > > >             memcpy(buf + (nbytes & ~3), &tmp, nbytes & 3);
> > > > >     }
> > > > >  }
> > > > Reviewed-by: Jorge Marques <jorge.marques@analog.com>
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.39.5
> > > > > 
> > > 
> > > This patch fixes the sub-word transfer case on big-endian kernels, but
> > > it still does not address the scenario of little-endian kernels
> > > accessing big- endian FIFOs.
> > > 
> > 
> > I would argue that's something for callers of these functions to care about.
> If each I3C driver has to handle FIFO endianness individually, it introduces
> unnecessary duplication and overhead across drivers. Centralizing this in the
> FIFO access helpers keeps the logic consistent, avoids repeated boilerplate,
> and reduces the chance of subtle bugs.

I mean, that's what spi and i2c drivers do already. With enum i3c_fifo_endian
you're already forcing users to care (or know) about endianism so they might as
well just pass the data in the proper order already (not sure if it's such a big
'burden').

That said, I'm not really in the loop for i3c so not sure what the expectations
are. IOW, have no strong feeling about this at all :)

- Nuno Sá

> > 
> > > With the current version, i3c_writel_fifo() and i3c_readl_fifo() only
> > > work when the FIFO has the same endianness as the CPU. On platforms
> > > such as the
> > > ZCU102 (Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC, Cortex-A53, little-endian), the I3C
> > > FIFOs are big-endian, and this patch alone is not sufficient -
> > > transfers fail in that configuration.
> > > 
> > > We have validated this on ZCU102, and the mismatch between LE kernel
> > > and BE FIFO is still an issue.
> > > 
> > > On top of this fix, explicit FIFO endianness support is required, as
> > > proposed in [PATCH v7 3/4] "i3c: master: Add endianness support for
> > > i3c_readl_fifo() and i3c_writel_fifo()". That approach adds an endian
> > > argument and uses
> > > writesl_be()/readsl_be() where necessary, e.g.:
> > > 
> > > static inline void i3c_writel_fifo(void __iomem *addr, const void
> > > *buf,
> > >                                    int nbytes, enum i3c_fifo_endian
> > > endian) {
> > >         if (endian)
> > >                 writesl_be(addr, buf, nbytes / 4);
> > >         else
> > >                 writesl(addr, buf, nbytes / 4);
> > > 
> > >         if (nbytes & 3) {
> > >                 u32 tmp = 0;
> > > 
> > >                 memcpy(&tmp, buf + (nbytes & ~3), nbytes & 3);
> > > 
> > >                 if (endian)
> > >                         writesl_be(addr, &tmp, 1);
> > >                 else
> > >                         writesl(addr, &tmp, 1);
> > >         }
> > > }
> > > 
> > > 
> Thanks,
> Manikanta.

-- 
linux-i3c mailing list
linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-i3c

  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-25  8:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-24 20:18 [PATCH] [v2] i3c: fix big-endian FIFO transfers Arnd Bergmann
2025-09-25  7:16 ` Jorge Marques
2025-09-25  7:37   ` Guntupalli, Manikanta
2025-09-25  7:51     ` Nuno Sá
2025-09-25  8:47       ` Guntupalli, Manikanta
2025-09-25  8:58         ` Nuno Sá [this message]
2025-09-25  9:35           ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-09-25 10:13             ` Nuno Sá
2025-09-25  8:55     ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-09-25 15:09 ` Frank Li
2025-09-26 10:38   ` Guntupalli, Manikanta
2025-09-28 22:19 ` Alexandre Belloni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e5a6789230840b31ef0f60ca0a770a4fb266da2a.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=noname.nuno@gmail.com \
    --cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=arnd@kernel.org \
    --cc=gastmaier@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@amd.com \
    --cc=jorge.marques@analog.com \
    --cc=linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manikanta.guntupalli@amd.com \
    --cc=michal.simek@amd.com \
    --cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox