From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Williamson Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:01:49 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] sba_iommu update (2.6 version) Message-Id: <1073948508.6497.128.camel@patsy.fc.hp.com> List-Id: References: <1073938588.6497.56.camel@patsy.fc.hp.com> In-Reply-To: <1073938588.6497.56.camel@patsy.fc.hp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 14:57, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Monday 12 January 2004 1:16 pm, Alex Williamson wrote: > > +__setup("sbapagesize=",sba_page_override); > > I still have this obsessive idea that we should get rid of the "sba" > references and replace them with "ioc". Would this be a good time > to rename at least the "nosbagart" and "sbapagesize" arguments? That is an obsessive idea ;^) I don't have strong opinions either way. I do like that currently "sba" boot parameters change the behavior of the "sba" code. So while it makes sense that it probably should be called iocpagesize, I'm reluctant to do it piece-wise. These parameters are intentionally not documented anywhere outside of the code, so I don't think changing them at some later point will cause too many problems. Thanks, Alex -- Alex Williamson HP Linux & Open Source Lab