From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Hansen Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 15:18:05 +0000 Subject: Re: Migrate pages from a ccNUMA node to another - patch Message-Id: <1080659885.3646.2106.camel@nighthawk> List-Id: References: <4063F581.ACC5C511@nospam.org> <1080321646.31638.105.camel@nighthawk> <40695C68.4A5F551E@nospam.org> In-Reply-To: <40695C68.4A5F551E@nospam.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Zoltan.Menyhart@bull.net Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 03:39, Zoltan Menyhart wrote: > Dave Hansen wrote: > > > > Have you considered any common ground your patch might share with the > > people doing memory hotplug? > > Comparing my stuff to their work, I just do some small performance enhancements: > > - I do not modify a single line on the existing VM paths - if my stuff has no > improvement for you, then yo will not be obliged to pay any overhead ... > - I handle only the simplest case: private anonymous pages (...a singe PTE...) By not modifying a single line in the existing VM path, your patch simply duplicates functionality from that existing code, which I'm not sure is any better. I think there's a lot of commonality with what the swap code, NUMA page migration, and memory removal have to do. However, none of them share any code today. I think all of the implementations could benefit from making them a bit more generic. -- Dave