From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arjan van de Ven Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 09:04:02 +0000 Subject: Re: hugetlb demand paging patch part [0/3] Message-Id: <1081933442.4688.6.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-EWB6MD/1nj3kUT+FMMpP" List-Id: References: <200404132317.i3DNH4F21162@unix-os.sc.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <200404132317.i3DNH4F21162@unix-os.sc.intel.com> To: "Chen, Kenneth W" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, raybry@sgi.com, 'Andy Whitcroft' , Andrew Morton --=-EWB6MD/1nj3kUT+FMMpP Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 01:17, Chen, Kenneth W wrote: > In addition to the hugetlb commit handling that we've been working on > off the list, Ray Bryant of SGI and I are also working on demand paging > for hugetlb page. Here are our final version that has been heavily > tested on ia64 and x86. I've broken the patch into 3 pieces so it's > easier to read/review, etc. Ok I think it's time to say "HO STOP" here. If you're going to make the kernel deal with different, concurrent page sizes then please do it for real. Or alternatively leave hugetlb to be the kludge/hack it is right now. Anything inbetween is the road to madness... --=-EWB6MD/1nj3kUT+FMMpP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBAfP6CxULwo51rQBIRAv/XAJ4oAaWDmILpvk+zbyQaZamKl9ZlPQCcD/Ee pT8aOtTp1bKjL2Vvqsd37/0= =BePD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-EWB6MD/1nj3kUT+FMMpP--