From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 04:13:49 +0000 Subject: Re: page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 Message-Id: <1094012028.6539.320.camel@gaston> List-Id: References: <20040816143903.GY11200@holomorphy.com> <20040827233602.GB1024@wotan.suse.de> <20040827172337.638275c3.davem@davemloft.net> <20040827173641.5cfb79f6.akpm@osdl.org> <20040828010253.GA50329@muc.de> <20040827183940.33b38bc2.akpm@osdl.org> <16687.59671.869708.795999@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20040827204241.25da512b.akpm@osdl.org> <20040827223954.7d021aac.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20040827223954.7d021aac.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Andrew Morton Cc: Christoph Lameter , Paul Mackerras , ak@muc.de, davem@davemloft.net, Andi Kleen , wli@holomorphy.com, "David S. Miller" , raybry@sgi.com, manfred@colorfullife.com, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel list , vrajesh@umich.edu, hugh@veritas.com On Sat, 2004-08-28 at 15:39, Andrew Morton wrote: > atomic64_t already appears to be implemented on alpha, ia64, mips, s390 and > sparc64. > > As I said - for both these applications we need a new type which is > atomic64_t on 64-bit and atomic_t on 32-bit. Implementing it on ppc64 is trivial. I'd vote for atomic_long_t though that is either 32 bits on 32 bits archs or 64 bits on 64 bits arch, as it would be a real pain (spinlock & all) to get a 64 bits atomic on ppc32 Ben.