From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@hp.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CPU Hotplug - Support for BSP removal
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 17:09:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1108400991.6175.27.camel@tdi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050212071417.B26140@unix-os.sc.intel.com>
On Sat, 2005-02-12 at 07:14 -0800, Ashok Raj wrote:
> Hi
>
> This patch requires the cpei retarget patch posted earlier.
>
> CAVEAT: tiger4 BIOS does not have the right value for branch reg0 when handed
> off to OS. I observed i could handoff the BSP to SAL, but due to incorrect jump
> address in b0, it ends up in some while (1); loop later. So we cannot send
> another IPI to wakeup the bsp. The system seemed to run fine with rest of
> the processors.
In my reading of the spec, I don't see how we can count on the BSP b0
being the appropriate value for return to SAL. If I don't enable the
fixup option, we branch off to some bad address and the CPU is lost.
With the fixup, hotplugging the BSP on and rx2600 seems to work.
> I havent done much with the cpep stuff.
At a minimum, the patches below are required. Thanks,
Alex
--
Alex Williamson HP Linux & Open Source Lab
--- linux/arch/ia64/Kconfig 2005-02-14 09:36:15.642178325 -0700
+++ linux/arch/ia64/Kconfig 2005-02-14 09:36:29.286709408 -0700
@@ -285,7 +285,7 @@
config BSP_REMOVE_WORKAROUND
bool "Enable temporary workaround to fix b0 value for CPU hotplug"
- depends on PERMIT_BSP_REMOVE && FORCE_CPEI_RETARGET && EXPERIMENTAL
+ depends on PERMIT_BSP_REMOVE && EXPERIMENTAL
default y
---help---
On tiger 4 systems's BSP's branch reg 0 (b0) is not set correctly.
--- linux/arch/ia64/kernel/topology.c 2005-02-14 09:37:20.191005660 -0700
+++ linux/arch/ia64/kernel/topology.c 2005-02-14 09:26:30.178318310 -0700
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
int arch_register_cpu(int num)
{
struct node *parent = NULL;
+ extern int cpe_vector;
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
parent = &sysfs_nodes[cpu_to_node(num)];
@@ -40,7 +41,7 @@
* If CPEI cannot be re-targetted, and this is
* CPEI target, then dont create the control file
*/
- if (!can_cpei_retarget() && is_cpu_cpei_target(num))
+ if (cpe_vector > 0 && !can_cpei_retarget() && is_cpu_cpei_target(num))
sysfs_cpus[num].cpu.no_control = 1;
return register_cpu(&sysfs_cpus[num].cpu, num, parent);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-14 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-12 15:14 CPU Hotplug - Support for BSP removal Ashok Raj
2005-02-14 17:09 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2005-02-14 21:40 ` Luck, Tony
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1108400991.6175.27.camel@tdi \
--to=alex.williamson@hp.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox