From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Rostedt Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 11:25:04 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAX_USER_RT_PRIO and MAX_RT_PRIO are wrong! Message-Id: <1118143504.4533.21.camel@localhost.localdomain> List-Id: References: <1118112390.4533.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050607053306.GA16181@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20050607053306.GA16181@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Ingo Molnar Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-altix@sgi.com, edwardsg@sgi.com, LKML , Andrew Morton , anton.wilson@camotion.com On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 07:33 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > I tested the patch on an SMP machine where MAX_RT_PRIO = 100 and > > MAX_USER_RT_PRIO = 99. Without the patch, the system crashes with a > > reboot. > > Acked-by: Ingo Molnar If this patch does go in, then xpc_activating in arch/ia64/sn/kernel/xpc_main.c (from rc6) also needs to use MAX_RT_PRIO instead of MAX_USER_RT_PRIO. Unless it is OK that it runs lower in priority than other kernel threads. -- Steve