From: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Question about interrupt enabling/disabling in kernel exit path
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 18:12:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1131559925.5214.100.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
Hello:
I have a question about enabling interrupts in the kernel exit path.
Especially, in do_notify_resume_user(). I have work that I need to
defer to this point, but it needs to run with interrupts enabled. I
wanted to piggy back off TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME, because that is more or less
generic code and gets handled in a C function where I can play the usual
header games: static inline wrapper function when feature is
configured; null macro when not.
I see a comment at the beginning of ia64_leave_kernel that says that
"work.need_resched, etc. mustn't get changed by this CPU before it
returns to user- or fsys-mode, hence we disable interrupts early on."
[This may be a stale comment. I.e., we now check for resched needed in
current task's thread_info flags.] But, then I see later that when
CONFIG_PREEMPT is set, we do enable interrupts and then re-disable them.
Then I notice that after we return from do_notify_resume_user() we don't
recheck TIF_NEED_RESCHED, etc. in the thread_info flags. So, maybe
this is the issue? If I open an interrupt window in
do_notify_resume_user(), 'NEED_RESCHED might get set and we wouldn't
notice it on return to the assembly language code. [I might even sleep
here. Is that a problem?]
I took a look at the x86_64 and i386 versions and they always goes back
to check for resched after calling their version of do_notify_resume()
[no '_user suffix on the routine]. If this were the only issue with
enabling interrupts in do_notify_resume_user(), I could change it to
return non-zero if recheck is needed [zero in the usual case] and then
go back and recheck thread_info flags.
Regards,
Lee
next reply other threads:[~2005-11-09 18:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-09 18:12 Lee Schermerhorn [this message]
2005-11-09 22:31 ` Question about interrupt enabling/disabling in kernel exit path Stephane Eranian
2005-11-14 21:52 ` David Mosberger-Tang
2005-11-15 20:21 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2005-11-15 21:04 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-11-15 21:16 ` David Mosberger-Tang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1131559925.5214.100.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox