public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: dann frazier <dannf@hp.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: initrd_size inflation breaks initramfs
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:24:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1133195073.6062.111.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1133159027.6062.98.camel@localhost>

On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 08:15 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Sunday, November 27, 2005 10:23 pm, dann frazier wrote:
> > hey,
> >   I've been trying to track down why initramfs seems to be broken on
> > ia64 when passed using the initrd= flag.  This appears to be due to an
> > inflated ia64_boot_param->initrd_size.  In my case, initrd_size got
> > set to 1957888 (which happens to be a multiple of 4K), when my
> > initramfs file is actually 1957415 bytes.
> >
> > unpack_to_rootfs() expects gunzip() to succeed until it has reached
> > the initrd_size.  Since it thinks the image is larger than it actually
> > is, it runs off the end of the initrd and the initramfs footprinting
> > fails. I can get unpack_to_rootfs to succeed by hardcoding my
> > initrd_size.
> >
> > My guess is that this is a bug in elilo.
> >
> > initrd.c has:
> >         /* round up to get required number of pages (4KB) */
> >         initrd->pgcnt = pgcnt = EFI_SIZE_TO_PAGES(size);
> >
> > initrd->pgcnt is later used to calculate the initrd_size boot param,
> > but it is now (size % 4096) bytes too big.
> 
> I thought this bug was fixed?  I remember Erik J. and I seeing the same 
> thing, and iirc we corrected elilo and sent the patch upstream.  Or is 
> this a different problem maybe?

I'm seeing this with Debian's 3.4-9 - 3.4 appears to be the latest
release here:
  ftp://ftp.hpl.hp.com/pub/linux-ia64/

But it appears to be > 2 years old.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-11-28 16:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-28  6:23 initrd_size inflation breaks initramfs dann frazier
2005-11-28  9:44 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-11-28 15:57 ` dann frazier
2005-11-28 16:15 ` Jesse Barnes
2005-11-28 16:24 ` dann frazier [this message]
2005-11-28 16:27 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-11-28 16:28 ` dann frazier
2005-11-28 16:45 ` Brett Johnson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1133195073.6062.111.camel@localhost \
    --to=dannf@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox