From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arjan van de Ven Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 18:59:07 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] ia64: change defconfig to NR_CPUS==1024 Message-Id: <1136573948.2940.65.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> List-Id: References: <20060106174957.GF19769@parisc-linux.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Christoph Lameter Cc: "Randy.Dunlap" , Matthew Wilcox , "Luck, Tony" , hawkes@sgi.com, Tony Luck , Andrew Morton , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jack Steiner , Dan Higgins , John Hesterberg , Greg Edwards > Vendors look for the upstream defaults and orient themselves on the > defconfig. they do? That's news to me. I've worked at a vendor for almost 5 years, 3 1/2 years of which I was the person who decided on the configs (with external input of course). In those 3 1/2 years I *never* looked at defconfig. *never*. And I don't expect other vendor kernel owners to do things differently; when a config option needs deciding you look at the description and pick a good value. That's it. Defconfig doesn't matter.