From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Rostedt Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 01:51:23 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/05] robust per_cpu allocation for modules Message-Id: <1145325083.17085.37.camel@localhost.localdomain> List-Id: References: <1145049535.1336.128.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4440855A.7040203@yahoo.com.au> <20060417220238.GD3945@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Ravikiran G Thirumalai , Nick Piggin , LKML , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Andi Kleen , Martin Mares , bjornw@axis.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, benedict.gaster@superh.com, lethal@linux-sh.org, Chris Zankel , Marc Gauthier , Joe Taylor , David Mosberger-Tang , rth@twiddle.net, spyro@f2s.com, starvik@axis.com, tony.luck@intel.com, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, ralf@linux-mips.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, grundler@parisc-linux.org, parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org, linux390@de.ibm.com, davem@davemloft.net On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 16:48 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > So now we can focus on a better solution. > > Could you have a look at Kiran's work? > > Maybe one result of your work could be that the existing indirection > for alloc_percpu could be avoided? Sure, I'll spend some time looking at what others have done and see what I can put together. I'm also very busy on other stuff at the moment, so this will be something I do more on the side. Don't think there's a rush here, but I stated in a previous post, I probably wont have something out for a month or two. -- Steve