From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arjan van de Ven Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 10:55:13 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] ia64: change usermode HZ to 250 Message-Id: <1151578513.3122.22.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> List-Id: References: <617E1C2C70743745A92448908E030B2A27FC5F@scsmsx411.amr.corp.intel.com> <1151578928.23785.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <44A3AFFB.2000203@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <44A3AFFB.2000203@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Jes Sorensen Cc: Alan Cox , "Luck, Tony" , John Daiker , John Hawkes , Tony Luck , Andrew Morton , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jack Steiner , Dan Higgins , Jeremy Higdon On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 12:48 +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote: > Alan Cox wrote: > > Ar Iau, 2006-06-29 am 05:37 -0400, ysgrifennodd Jes Sorensen: > >> You have my vote for that one. Anything else is just going to cause > >> those broken userapps to continue doing the wrong thing. We should > >> really do this on all archs though. > > > > No need, all current mainstream architectures expose a constant user HZ. > Hi, > But you are still going to have the issue where someone installs their > own kernel and apps will break because of this? to answer that question with one word: no. read what Alan said: the HZ exposed to userspace is *constant*. For example, the i386 user visible HZ is 100, even if the kernel runs at a HZ of 250 or 1000.... Just when a HZ value gets exposed to userspace, it's transformed into a HZ0 based value. And that's not a distribution thing, that's the kernel.org kernel honoring the stable-userspace-interface contract, and common sense.. Greetings, Arjan van de Ven