From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Doug Chapman <doug.chapman@hp.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:31:48 +0000
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] ia64 clocksource
Message-Id: <1184862708.3825.14.camel@dchapman.boston.redhat.com>
List-Id: <linux-ia64.vger.kernel.org>
References: <20070714002509.GJ2317@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20070714002509.GJ2317@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 14:33 -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> On the subject of whether to push into 2.6.23 or cook in -mm until
> 2.6.24 ... I'm not sure how much benefit we'd get from the delay.
> Anyone want to stand up and be counted as running serious testing
> on -mm kernels on ia64?  I fear that the amount of extra testing
> that we'd get is really quite small.  2.6.23-rc1 is only a week away,
> and this code is very subtle in places ... I'm nervous about this.

I have been doing testing out of your ia64 git and linus's git trees on
our HP hardware.  I am thinking adding -mm would certainly be
worthwhile.

- Doug