public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Doug Chapman <doug.chapman@hp.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: panic from vector domain patch (was RE: Linus' tree broken?)
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:03:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1185368601.5180.0.camel@athlon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1185239265.19353.6.camel@phobos>

On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 17:59 +0900, Kenji Kaneshige wrote:
> Doug,
> 
> 2007-07-25 (水) の 01:09 -0400 に Doug Chapman さんは書きました:
> > Yasuaki,
> > 
> > I added a bunch of printk's to try to better understand this.
> > ia64_mv.setup does get initialized properly but then gets overwritten.
> > It appears that it gets overwritten in __bind_irq_vector but I have not
> > narrowed down exactly where.  I put a printk at the top and bottom of
> > this function to show what ia64_mv.setup is and I am finding that on the
> > 3rd call to this function it causes ia64_mv.setup to get set to -1.
> > 
> > It is getting way too late for me (1AM here).  I will try to dig into
> > this more tomorrow but at least I have narrowed it down to a bit of code
> > that actually is touched by the commit that causes the panic.
> > 
> > - Doug
> 
> I found a bug which causes wrong access to vector_table[] array.
> I guess ia64_mv.setup was destroyed by this. Could you try the
> attached patch?
> 
> Thanks,
> Kenji Kaneshige
> ---
> 
> Fix wrong access to vector_table[].
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
> 
> ---
>  arch/ia64/kernel/irq_ia64.c |   21 ++++++++++-----------
>  1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6.23-rc1/arch/ia64/kernel/irq_ia64.c
> =================================> --- linux-2.6.23-rc1.orig/arch/ia64/kernel/irq_ia64.c
> +++ linux-2.6.23-rc1/arch/ia64/kernel/irq_ia64.c
> @@ -85,8 +85,8 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(int[IA64_NUM_VECTORS], ve
>  	[0 ... IA64_NUM_VECTORS - 1] = IA64_SPURIOUS_INT_VECTOR
>  };
>  
> -static cpumask_t vector_table[IA64_MAX_DEVICE_VECTORS] = {
> -	[0 ... IA64_MAX_DEVICE_VECTORS - 1] = CPU_MASK_NONE
> +static cpumask_t vector_table[IA64_NUM_VECTORS] = {
> +	[0 ... IA64_NUM_VECTORS - 1] = CPU_MASK_NONE
>  };
>  
>  static int irq_status[NR_IRQS] = {
> @@ -123,17 +123,18 @@ static inline int find_unassigned_irq(vo
>  static inline int find_unassigned_vector(cpumask_t domain)
>  {
>  	cpumask_t mask;
> -	int pos;
> +	int pos, vector;
>  
>  	cpus_and(mask, domain, cpu_online_map);
>  	if (cpus_empty(mask))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	for (pos = 0; pos < IA64_NUM_DEVICE_VECTORS; pos++) {
> -		cpus_and(mask, domain, vector_table[pos]);
> +		vector = IA64_FIRST_DEVICE_VECTOR + pos;
> +		cpus_and(mask, domain, vector_table[vector]);
>  		if (!cpus_empty(mask))
>  			continue;
> -		return IA64_FIRST_DEVICE_VECTOR + pos;
> +		return vector;
>  	}
>  	return -ENOSPC;
>  }
> @@ -141,7 +142,7 @@ static inline int find_unassigned_vector
>  static int __bind_irq_vector(int irq, int vector, cpumask_t domain)
>  {
>  	cpumask_t mask;
> -	int cpu, pos;
> +	int cpu;
>  	struct irq_cfg *cfg = &irq_cfg[irq];
>  
>  	cpus_and(mask, domain, cpu_online_map);
> @@ -156,8 +157,7 @@ static int __bind_irq_vector(int irq, in
>  	cfg->vector = vector;
>  	cfg->domain = domain;
>  	irq_status[irq] = IRQ_USED;
> -	pos = vector - IA64_FIRST_DEVICE_VECTOR;
> -	cpus_or(vector_table[pos], vector_table[pos], domain);
> +	cpus_or(vector_table[vector], vector_table[vector], domain);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ int bind_irq_vector(int irq, int vector,
>  
>  static void __clear_irq_vector(int irq)
>  {
> -	int vector, cpu, pos;
> +	int vector, cpu;
>  	cpumask_t mask;
>  	cpumask_t domain;
>  	struct irq_cfg *cfg = &irq_cfg[irq];
> @@ -189,8 +189,7 @@ static void __clear_irq_vector(int irq)
>  	cfg->vector = IRQ_VECTOR_UNASSIGNED;
>  	cfg->domain = CPU_MASK_NONE;
>  	irq_status[irq] = IRQ_UNUSED;
> -	pos = vector - IA64_FIRST_DEVICE_VECTOR;
> -	cpus_andnot(vector_table[pos], vector_table[pos], domain);
> +	cpus_andnot(vector_table[vector], vector_table[vector], domain);
>  }
>  
>  static void clear_irq_vector(int irq)
> 
> 

Kenji,

Yes, this does fix the problem.  My system is booting just fine with
this patch.

good job,

- Doug



  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-07-25 13:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-24  1:07 panic from vector domain patch (was RE: Linus' tree broken?) Doug Chapman
2007-07-24  2:06 ` Doug Chapman
2007-07-24  2:26 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2007-07-24 13:09 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2007-07-24 13:55 ` Doug Chapman
2007-07-24 14:28 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2007-07-25  0:19 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2007-07-25  1:12 ` Doug Chapman
2007-07-25  2:55 ` Doug Chapman
2007-07-25  5:09 ` Doug Chapman
2007-07-25  8:59 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2007-07-25 13:03 ` Doug Chapman [this message]
2007-07-25 13:37 ` Horms
2007-07-25 15:26 ` Doug Chapman
2007-07-26  1:31 ` Horms
2007-07-26  2:55 ` Horms
2007-07-30  9:56 ` Jes Sorensen
2007-07-30 13:42 ` Doug Chapman
2007-07-30 13:53 ` Jes Sorensen
2007-07-31 14:34 ` Jes Sorensen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1185368601.5180.0.camel@athlon \
    --to=doug.chapman@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox