From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shaohua Li Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 01:07:46 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH]Fix the order of atomic operations in Message-Id: <1200964066.1353.0.camel@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> List-Id: References: <4790D1DE.8030700@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4790D1DE.8030700@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Masami Hiramatsu Cc: "Luck, Tony" , ia64 , LKML , systemtap-ml On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 00:20 +0800, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > From: Masami Hiramatsu > > Fix the order of atomic operations to prevent overwriting > prev_kprobe[0]. > To pop values from stack, we must decrement stack index right AFTER > reading values. > > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu > --- > Details of this issue was reported to > http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id 71 > > arch/ia64/kernel/kprobes.c | 7 ++++--- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > Index: 2.6.24-rc8/arch/ia64/kernel/kprobes.c > =================================> --- 2.6.24-rc8.orig/arch/ia64/kernel/kprobes.c 2008-01-17 > 21:14:01.000000000 -0500 > +++ 2.6.24-rc8/arch/ia64/kernel/kprobes.c 2008-01-17 > 21:14:01.000000000 -0500 > @@ -381,9 +381,10 @@ > static void __kprobes restore_previous_kprobe(struct kprobe_ctlblk > *kcb) > { > unsigned int i; > - i = atomic_sub_return(1, &kcb->prev_kprobe_index); > - __get_cpu_var(current_kprobe) = kcb->prev_kprobe[i].kp; > - kcb->kprobe_status = kcb->prev_kprobe[i].status; > + i = atomic_read(&kcb->prev_kprobe_index); > + __get_cpu_var(current_kprobe) = kcb->prev_kprobe[i-1].kp; > + kcb->kprobe_status = kcb->prev_kprobe[i-1].status; > + atomic_sub(1, &kcb->prev_kprobe_index); > } > > static void __kprobes set_current_kprobe(struct kprobe *p, Acked. Thanks for the patch. Thanks, Shaohua