From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 22:58:56 +0000 Subject: Re: the printk problem Message-Id: <1215212336.8970.6.camel@pasglop> List-Id: References: <20080625131101.GA6205@digi.com> <20080704104634.GA31634@digi.com> <20080704111540.ddffd241.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080704132716.f1e12554.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080704204252.GM14894@parisc-linux.org> In-Reply-To: <20080704204252.GM14894@parisc-linux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Peter Anvin , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , "David S. Miller" > u64 is easy to fix, and I don't know why we haven't. Just make it > unsigned long long on all architectures. Yup. Also, one of the major user of that is to print a struct resource, which everybody does differently, so we may even look at doing a %pR that does the nice start..end [attr].. Ben.