From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 11:35:30 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make u64 long long on all architectures (was: the Message-Id: <1216726530.11027.205.camel@pasglop> List-Id: References: <20080625131101.GA6205@digi.com> <20080704104634.GA31634@digi.com> <20080704111540.ddffd241.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080704132716.f1e12554.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080704204252.GM14894@parisc-linux.org> <20080704150100.1f7b8a65.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080705020350.GN14894@parisc-linux.org> <20080722030506.206a2cc2.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20080722030506.206a2cc2.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Andrew Morton Cc: Matthew Wilcox , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Peter Anvin , Linus Torvalds , "David S. Miller" > > This is (IMO) a desirable change and will prevent a heck of a lot of > goofing around, and will permit a lot of prior goofing around to > be removed. > > But I bet there are lots of instalces of printk("%l", some_u64) down in > arch code where the type of u64 _is_ known which will now spew warnings. Well, I'm about to call a big "warning fixing day" on the powerpc list, I saw a few today when building a couple of configs and that hurts my eyes so we may as well fold that in :-) Cheers, Ben.