From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] IA64 dynamic ftrace support
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 03:54:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1230177273.30177.134.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1230012500.10933.102.camel@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com>
On Thu, 2008-12-25 at 09:08 +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 05:50:50AM +0800, Keith Owens wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 08:29:05 -0500,
> > Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >Yes I understand that the module and kernel code is set up differently,
> > >PPC is pretty much the same in this aspect. I'm asking if it is easy to
> > >change a call from the module to kernel core to another function in
> > >kernel core?
> > >
> > >Question: if I have a call from the module to _mcount, how much has to
> > >change in the set up of the registers to make it call ftrace_call
> > >instead? Perhaps we could link in a call to ftrace_call via the tricks
> > >in recordmcount.pl to get the info needed to make that change?
> >
> > The IA64 kernel uses the same gp register throughout, it is compiled
> > with -mconstant-gp. So changing the target address from one kernel
> > function to another only requires changing the destination address in
> > the PLT stub, no other registers are affected.
> yes, for kernel, this is simple. Just changing the target address is ok,
> and the change is atomic, as it's a 64-bit write. For module, it's not
> simple. Module has different gp register against kernel. In a module,
> _mcount must save its gp first and then jump to kernel. That's why we
> can't directly use a jump.
>
> I'm considering link some code to ftrace_call in recordmcount.pl, but
> recordmocunt.pl is called for each file. If a module has multiple files,
> there will be some duplicate code. Another issue how can we find the
> code's address when ftrace to convert code to nop.
Since this still sounds like PPC actions, I'll try to show a pseudo code
style example.
I'm assuming that a call to mcount from a module looks something like
this:
save module gp
load kernel gp
jump to mcount (or to a mcount trampoline)
Since mcount and ftrace_caller share the same gp, could we not just
change that jmp to ftrace_caller instead? (or to a trampoline to
ftrace_caller as we do in PPC).
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-25 3:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-23 6:08 [PATCH 5/5] IA64 dynamic ftrace support Shaohua Li
2008-12-23 14:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-12-24 0:54 ` Shaohua Li
2008-12-24 1:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-12-24 8:08 ` Shaohua Li
2008-12-24 13:29 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-12-24 21:50 ` Keith Owens
2008-12-25 1:08 ` Shaohua Li
2008-12-25 3:54 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2008-12-25 4:01 ` Shaohua Li
2008-12-26 2:42 ` Shaohua Li
2008-12-31 9:11 ` Shaohua Li
2009-01-06 0:42 ` Luck, Tony
2009-01-08 8:05 ` Shaohua Li
2009-01-08 17:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-08 20:25 ` Luck, Tony
2009-01-08 22:24 ` Luck, Tony
2009-01-09 2:42 ` Shaohua Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1230177273.30177.134.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=srostedt@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox