public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Xinwei Hu <huxinwei@huawei.com>,
	Wuyun <wuyun.wu@huawei.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	arnab.basu@freescale.com, x86@kernel.org,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,
	Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 20/20] PCI/MSI: Clean up unused MSI arch functions
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 07:26:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1407828373-24322-21-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1407828373-24322-1-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com>

Now we use struct msi_chip in all platforms to configure
MSI/MSI-X. We can clean up the unused arch functions.

Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/pci/msi.c |   82 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
 1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
index feba5dd..2d2d4cd 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
@@ -41,33 +41,7 @@ struct msi_chip * __weak arch_get_match_msi_chip(struct device *dev)
 	return NULL;
 }
 
-int __weak arch_setup_msi_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, struct msi_desc *desc) 
-{
-	int err;
-	struct msi_chip *chip = arch_get_match_msi_chip(&dev->dev);
-
-	if (!chip || !chip->setup_irq)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	err = chip->setup_irq(&dev->dev, desc);
-	if (err < 0)
-		return err;
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-void __weak arch_teardown_msi_irq(unsigned int irq)
-{
-	struct msi_desc *entry = irq_get_msi_desc(irq);
-	struct msi_chip *chip = arch_get_match_msi_chip(&entry->dev->dev);
-
-	if (!chip || !chip->teardown_irq)
-		return;
-
-	chip->teardown_irq(irq);
-}
-
-int __weak arch_msi_check_device(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type)
+static int msi_check_device(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type)
 {
 	struct msi_chip *chip = arch_get_match_msi_chip(&dev->dev);
 
@@ -77,25 +51,31 @@ int __weak arch_msi_check_device(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type)
 	return chip->check_device(&dev->dev, nvec, type);
 }
 
-int __weak arch_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type)
+static int setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type)
 {
 	struct msi_desc *entry;
 	int ret;
 	struct msi_chip *chip;
 
 	chip = arch_get_match_msi_chip(&dev->dev);
-	if (chip && chip->setup_irqs)
+	if (!chip)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (chip->setup_irqs)
 		return chip->setup_irqs(&dev->dev, nvec, type);
 	
 	/*
 	 * If an architecture wants to support multiple MSI, it needs to
-	 * override arch_setup_msi_irqs()
+	 * provide chip->setup_irqs()
 	 */
 	if (type = PCI_CAP_ID_MSI && nvec > 1)
 		return 1;
 
+	if (!chip->setup_irq)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	list_for_each_entry(entry, &dev->msi_list, list) {
-		ret = arch_setup_msi_irq(dev, entry);
+		ret = chip->setup_irq(&dev->dev, entry);
 		if (ret < 0)
 			return ret;
 		if (ret > 0)
@@ -105,13 +85,20 @@ int __weak arch_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-/*
- * We have a default implementation available as a separate non-weak
- * function, as it is used by the Xen x86 PCI code
- */
-void default_teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev)
+static void teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev)
 {
 	struct msi_desc *entry;
+	struct msi_chip *chip;
+
+	chip = arch_get_match_msi_chip(&dev->dev);
+	if (!chip)
+		return;
+
+	if (chip->teardown_irqs)
+		return chip->teardown_irqs(&dev->dev);
+
+	if (!chip->teardown_irq)
+		return;
 
 	list_for_each_entry(entry, &dev->msi_list, list) {
 		int i, nvec;
@@ -122,15 +109,10 @@ void default_teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev)
 		else
 			nvec = 1 << entry->msi_attrib.multiple;
 		for (i = 0; i < nvec; i++)
-			arch_teardown_msi_irq(entry->irq + i);
+			chip->teardown_irq(entry->irq + i);
 	}
 }
 
-void __weak arch_teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev)
-{
-	return default_teardown_msi_irqs(dev);
-}
-
 static void default_restore_msi_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, int irq)
 {
 	struct msi_desc *entry;
@@ -149,9 +131,9 @@ static void default_restore_msi_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, int irq)
 		write_msi_msg(irq, &entry->msg);
 }
 
-void __weak arch_restore_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev)
+static void restore_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev)
 {
-	struct msi_chip *chip = arch_get_msi_chip(&dev->dev);
+	struct msi_chip *chip = arch_get_match_msi_chip(&dev->dev);
 	if (chip && chip->restore_irqs)
 		return chip->restore_irqs(&dev->dev);
 
@@ -386,7 +368,7 @@ static void free_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev)
 			BUG_ON(irq_has_action(entry->irq + i));
 	}
 
-	arch_teardown_msi_irqs(dev);
+	teardown_msi_irqs(dev);
 
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &dev->msi_list, list) {
 		if (entry->msi_attrib.is_msix) {
@@ -456,7 +438,7 @@ static void __pci_restore_msi_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
 
 	pci_intx_for_msi(dev, 0);
 	msi_set_enable(dev, 0);
-	arch_restore_msi_irqs(dev);
+	restore_msi_irqs(dev);
 
 	pci_read_config_word(dev, dev->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_FLAGS, &control);
 	msi_mask_irq(entry, msi_mask(entry->msi_attrib.multi_cap),
@@ -479,7 +461,7 @@ static void __pci_restore_msix_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
 	msix_clear_and_set_ctrl(dev, 0,
 				PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_ENABLE | PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_MASKALL);
 
-	arch_restore_msi_irqs(dev);
+	restore_msi_irqs(dev);
 	list_for_each_entry(entry, &dev->msi_list, list) {
 		msix_mask_irq(entry, entry->masked);
 	}
@@ -650,7 +632,7 @@ static int msi_capability_init(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec)
 	list_add_tail(&entry->list, &dev->msi_list);
 
 	/* Configure MSI capability structure */
-	ret = arch_setup_msi_irqs(dev, nvec, PCI_CAP_ID_MSI);
+	ret = setup_msi_irqs(dev, nvec, PCI_CAP_ID_MSI);
 	if (ret) {
 		msi_mask_irq(entry, mask, ~mask);
 		free_msi_irqs(dev);
@@ -766,7 +748,7 @@ static int msix_capability_init(struct pci_dev *dev,
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	ret = arch_setup_msi_irqs(dev, nvec, PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX);
+	ret = setup_msi_irqs(dev, nvec, PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX);
 	if (ret)
 		goto out_avail;
 
@@ -853,7 +835,7 @@ static int pci_msi_check_device(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type)
 		if (bus->bus_flags & PCI_BUS_FLAGS_NO_MSI)
 			return -EINVAL;
 
-	ret = arch_msi_check_device(dev, nvec, type);
+	ret = msi_check_device(dev, nvec, type);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-- 
1.7.1


      parent reply	other threads:[~2014-08-12  7:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-12  7:25 [RFC PATCH 00/20] Use msi_chip to configure MSI/MSI-X in all platforms Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:25 ` [RFC PATCH 01/20] x86/xen/MSI: Eliminate arch_msix_mask_irq() and arch_msi_mask_irq() Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  9:09   ` [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 01/20] x86/xen/MSI: Eliminate arch_msix_mask_irq() and arch_msi_mask_irq( David Vrabel
2014-08-12 11:11     ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:25 ` [RFC PATCH 04/20] MSI: Remove the redundant irq_set_chip_data() Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:25 ` [RFC PATCH 06/20] PCI/MSI: Introduce arch_get_match_msi_chip() to find the match msi_chip Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 07/20] x86/MSI: Use msi_chip instead of arch func to configure MSI/MSI-X Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 19:09   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-08-13  1:16     ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 08/20] x86/xen/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 09/20] irq_remapping/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 10/20] x86/MSI: Remove unused MSI weak arch functions Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 11/20] MIPS/Octeon/MSI: Use msi_chip instead of arch func to configure MSI/MSI-X Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 12/20] MIPS/Xlp/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 13/20] MIPS/xlr/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 14/20] Powerpc/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 15/20] s390/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 16/20] arm/iop13xx/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 17/20] IA64/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 18/20] Sparc/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 19/20] tile/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:26 ` Yijing Wang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1407828373-24322-21-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com \
    --to=wangyijing@huawei.com \
    --cc=arnab.basu@freescale.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=huxinwei@huawei.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=wuyun.wu@huawei.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox