From: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Xinwei Hu <huxinwei@huawei.com>,
Wuyun <wuyun.wu@huawei.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
arnab.basu@freescale.com, x86@kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,
Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 20/20] PCI/MSI: Clean up unused MSI arch functions
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 07:26:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1407828373-24322-21-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1407828373-24322-1-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com>
Now we use struct msi_chip in all platforms to configure
MSI/MSI-X. We can clean up the unused arch functions.
Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
---
drivers/pci/msi.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
index feba5dd..2d2d4cd 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
@@ -41,33 +41,7 @@ struct msi_chip * __weak arch_get_match_msi_chip(struct device *dev)
return NULL;
}
-int __weak arch_setup_msi_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, struct msi_desc *desc)
-{
- int err;
- struct msi_chip *chip = arch_get_match_msi_chip(&dev->dev);
-
- if (!chip || !chip->setup_irq)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- err = chip->setup_irq(&dev->dev, desc);
- if (err < 0)
- return err;
-
- return 0;
-}
-
-void __weak arch_teardown_msi_irq(unsigned int irq)
-{
- struct msi_desc *entry = irq_get_msi_desc(irq);
- struct msi_chip *chip = arch_get_match_msi_chip(&entry->dev->dev);
-
- if (!chip || !chip->teardown_irq)
- return;
-
- chip->teardown_irq(irq);
-}
-
-int __weak arch_msi_check_device(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type)
+static int msi_check_device(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type)
{
struct msi_chip *chip = arch_get_match_msi_chip(&dev->dev);
@@ -77,25 +51,31 @@ int __weak arch_msi_check_device(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type)
return chip->check_device(&dev->dev, nvec, type);
}
-int __weak arch_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type)
+static int setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type)
{
struct msi_desc *entry;
int ret;
struct msi_chip *chip;
chip = arch_get_match_msi_chip(&dev->dev);
- if (chip && chip->setup_irqs)
+ if (!chip)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (chip->setup_irqs)
return chip->setup_irqs(&dev->dev, nvec, type);
/*
* If an architecture wants to support multiple MSI, it needs to
- * override arch_setup_msi_irqs()
+ * provide chip->setup_irqs()
*/
if (type = PCI_CAP_ID_MSI && nvec > 1)
return 1;
+ if (!chip->setup_irq)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
list_for_each_entry(entry, &dev->msi_list, list) {
- ret = arch_setup_msi_irq(dev, entry);
+ ret = chip->setup_irq(&dev->dev, entry);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
if (ret > 0)
@@ -105,13 +85,20 @@ int __weak arch_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type)
return 0;
}
-/*
- * We have a default implementation available as a separate non-weak
- * function, as it is used by the Xen x86 PCI code
- */
-void default_teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev)
+static void teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev)
{
struct msi_desc *entry;
+ struct msi_chip *chip;
+
+ chip = arch_get_match_msi_chip(&dev->dev);
+ if (!chip)
+ return;
+
+ if (chip->teardown_irqs)
+ return chip->teardown_irqs(&dev->dev);
+
+ if (!chip->teardown_irq)
+ return;
list_for_each_entry(entry, &dev->msi_list, list) {
int i, nvec;
@@ -122,15 +109,10 @@ void default_teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev)
else
nvec = 1 << entry->msi_attrib.multiple;
for (i = 0; i < nvec; i++)
- arch_teardown_msi_irq(entry->irq + i);
+ chip->teardown_irq(entry->irq + i);
}
}
-void __weak arch_teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev)
-{
- return default_teardown_msi_irqs(dev);
-}
-
static void default_restore_msi_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, int irq)
{
struct msi_desc *entry;
@@ -149,9 +131,9 @@ static void default_restore_msi_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, int irq)
write_msi_msg(irq, &entry->msg);
}
-void __weak arch_restore_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev)
+static void restore_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev)
{
- struct msi_chip *chip = arch_get_msi_chip(&dev->dev);
+ struct msi_chip *chip = arch_get_match_msi_chip(&dev->dev);
if (chip && chip->restore_irqs)
return chip->restore_irqs(&dev->dev);
@@ -386,7 +368,7 @@ static void free_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev)
BUG_ON(irq_has_action(entry->irq + i));
}
- arch_teardown_msi_irqs(dev);
+ teardown_msi_irqs(dev);
list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &dev->msi_list, list) {
if (entry->msi_attrib.is_msix) {
@@ -456,7 +438,7 @@ static void __pci_restore_msi_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
pci_intx_for_msi(dev, 0);
msi_set_enable(dev, 0);
- arch_restore_msi_irqs(dev);
+ restore_msi_irqs(dev);
pci_read_config_word(dev, dev->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_FLAGS, &control);
msi_mask_irq(entry, msi_mask(entry->msi_attrib.multi_cap),
@@ -479,7 +461,7 @@ static void __pci_restore_msix_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
msix_clear_and_set_ctrl(dev, 0,
PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_ENABLE | PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_MASKALL);
- arch_restore_msi_irqs(dev);
+ restore_msi_irqs(dev);
list_for_each_entry(entry, &dev->msi_list, list) {
msix_mask_irq(entry, entry->masked);
}
@@ -650,7 +632,7 @@ static int msi_capability_init(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec)
list_add_tail(&entry->list, &dev->msi_list);
/* Configure MSI capability structure */
- ret = arch_setup_msi_irqs(dev, nvec, PCI_CAP_ID_MSI);
+ ret = setup_msi_irqs(dev, nvec, PCI_CAP_ID_MSI);
if (ret) {
msi_mask_irq(entry, mask, ~mask);
free_msi_irqs(dev);
@@ -766,7 +748,7 @@ static int msix_capability_init(struct pci_dev *dev,
if (ret)
return ret;
- ret = arch_setup_msi_irqs(dev, nvec, PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX);
+ ret = setup_msi_irqs(dev, nvec, PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX);
if (ret)
goto out_avail;
@@ -853,7 +835,7 @@ static int pci_msi_check_device(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type)
if (bus->bus_flags & PCI_BUS_FLAGS_NO_MSI)
return -EINVAL;
- ret = arch_msi_check_device(dev, nvec, type);
+ ret = msi_check_device(dev, nvec, type);
if (ret)
return ret;
--
1.7.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-12 7:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-12 7:25 [RFC PATCH 00/20] Use msi_chip to configure MSI/MSI-X in all platforms Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 7:25 ` [RFC PATCH 01/20] x86/xen/MSI: Eliminate arch_msix_mask_irq() and arch_msi_mask_irq() Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 9:09 ` [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 01/20] x86/xen/MSI: Eliminate arch_msix_mask_irq() and arch_msi_mask_irq( David Vrabel
2014-08-12 11:11 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 7:25 ` [RFC PATCH 04/20] MSI: Remove the redundant irq_set_chip_data() Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 7:25 ` [RFC PATCH 06/20] PCI/MSI: Introduce arch_get_match_msi_chip() to find the match msi_chip Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 07/20] x86/MSI: Use msi_chip instead of arch func to configure MSI/MSI-X Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 19:09 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-08-13 1:16 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 08/20] x86/xen/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 09/20] irq_remapping/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 10/20] x86/MSI: Remove unused MSI weak arch functions Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 11/20] MIPS/Octeon/MSI: Use msi_chip instead of arch func to configure MSI/MSI-X Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 12/20] MIPS/Xlp/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 13/20] MIPS/xlr/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 14/20] Powerpc/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 15/20] s390/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 16/20] arm/iop13xx/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 17/20] IA64/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 18/20] Sparc/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 19/20] tile/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 7:26 ` Yijing Wang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1407828373-24322-21-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com \
--to=wangyijing@huawei.com \
--cc=arnab.basu@freescale.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=huxinwei@huawei.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=wuyun.wu@huawei.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox