public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	dja@axtens.net, x86@kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org,
	Liviu Dudau <liviu@dudau.co.uk>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v10 29/29] PCI: Remove pci_bus_assign_domain_nr()
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 11:34:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1429616088-10249-30-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1429616088-10249-1-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com>

Now we save the domain number in pci_host_bridge,
we could remove pci_bus_assign_domain_nr() and
clean the domain member in pci_bus. Also move
pci_host_assign_domain_nr() to drivers/pci/host-bridge.c
for simplicity.

Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/pci/host-bridge.c |   68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/pci/pci.c         |   72 ---------------------------------------------
 drivers/pci/pci.h         |    9 -----
 drivers/pci/probe.c       |   11 ++-----
 include/linux/pci.h       |    3 --
 5 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/host-bridge.c b/drivers/pci/host-bridge.c
index 5ae9ab8..1b5b27d 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/host-bridge.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/host-bridge.c
@@ -5,12 +5,80 @@
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/pci.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_pci.h>
 
 #include "pci.h"
 
 static LIST_HEAD(pci_host_bridge_list);
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(pci_host_mutex);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS
+static atomic_t __domain_nr = ATOMIC_INIT(-1);
+
+int pci_get_new_domain_nr(void)
+{
+	return atomic_inc_return(&__domain_nr);
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC
+static int pci_assign_domain_nr(struct device *dev)
+{
+	static int use_dt_domains = -1;
+	int domain = of_get_pci_domain_nr(dev->of_node);
+
+	/*
+	 * Check DT domain and use_dt_domains values.
+	 *
+	 * If DT domain property is valid (domain >= 0) and
+	 * use_dt_domains != 0, the DT assignment is valid since this means
+	 * we have not previously allocated a domain number by using
+	 * pci_get_new_domain_nr(); we should also update use_dt_domains to
+	 * 1, to indicate that we have just assigned a domain number from
+	 * DT.
+	 *
+	 * If DT domain property value is not valid (ie domain < 0), and we
+	 * have not previously assigned a domain number from DT
+	 * (use_dt_domains != 1) we should assign a domain number by
+	 * using the:
+	 *
+	 * pci_get_new_domain_nr()
+	 *
+	 * API and update the use_dt_domains value to keep track of method we
+	 * are using to assign domain numbers (use_dt_domains = 0).
+	 *
+	 * All other combinations imply we have a platform that is trying
+	 * to mix domain numbers obtained from DT and pci_get_new_domain_nr(),
+	 * which is a recipe for domain mishandling and it is prevented by
+	 * invalidating the domain value (domain = -1) and printing a
+	 * corresponding error.
+	 */
+	if (domain >= 0 && use_dt_domains) {
+		use_dt_domains = 1;
+	} else if (domain < 0 && use_dt_domains != 1) {
+		use_dt_domains = 0;
+		domain = pci_get_new_domain_nr();
+	} else {
+		dev_err(dev, "Node %s has inconsistent \"linux,pci-domain\" property in DT\n",
+			dev->of_node->full_name);
+		domain = -1;
+	}
+
+	return domain;
+}
+#endif
+#endif
+
+static void pci_host_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_host_bridge *host,
+		int domain)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC
+	host->domain = pci_assign_domain_nr(host->dev.parent);
+#else
+	host->domain = domain;
+#endif
+}
+
 static void pci_release_host_bridge_dev(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct resource_entry *entry;
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
index d5cbea8..1538a74 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
@@ -10,8 +10,6 @@
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <linux/init.h>
-#include <linux/of.h>
-#include <linux/of_pci.h>
 #include <linux/pci.h>
 #include <linux/pm.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
@@ -4520,76 +4518,6 @@ static void pci_no_domains(void)
 #endif
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS
-static atomic_t __domain_nr = ATOMIC_INIT(-1);
-
-int pci_get_new_domain_nr(void)
-{
-	return atomic_inc_return(&__domain_nr);
-}
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC
-static int pci_assign_domain_nr(struct device *dev)
-{
-	static int use_dt_domains = -1;
-	int domain = of_get_pci_domain_nr(dev->of_node);
-
-	/*
-	 * Check DT domain and use_dt_domains values.
-	 *
-	 * If DT domain property is valid (domain >= 0) and
-	 * use_dt_domains != 0, the DT assignment is valid since this means
-	 * we have not previously allocated a domain number by using
-	 * pci_get_new_domain_nr(); we should also update use_dt_domains to
-	 * 1, to indicate that we have just assigned a domain number from
-	 * DT.
-	 *
-	 * If DT domain property value is not valid (ie domain < 0), and we
-	 * have not previously assigned a domain number from DT
-	 * (use_dt_domains != 1) we should assign a domain number by
-	 * using the:
-	 *
-	 * pci_get_new_domain_nr()
-	 *
-	 * API and update the use_dt_domains value to keep track of method we
-	 * are using to assign domain numbers (use_dt_domains = 0).
-	 *
-	 * All other combinations imply we have a platform that is trying
-	 * to mix domain numbers obtained from DT and pci_get_new_domain_nr(),
-	 * which is a recipe for domain mishandling and it is prevented by
-	 * invalidating the domain value (domain = -1) and printing a
-	 * corresponding error.
-	 */
-	if (domain >= 0 && use_dt_domains) {
-		use_dt_domains = 1;
-	} else if (domain < 0 && use_dt_domains != 1) {
-		use_dt_domains = 0;
-		domain = pci_get_new_domain_nr();
-	} else {
-		dev_err(dev, "Node %s has inconsistent \"linux,pci-domain\" property in DT\n",
-			dev->of_node->full_name);
-		domain = -1;
-	}
-
-	return domain;
-}
-
-void pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus, struct device *parent)
-{
-	bus->domain_nr = pci_assign_domain_nr(parent);
-}
-#endif
-#endif
-
-void pci_host_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_host_bridge *host, int domain)
-{
-#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC
-	host->domain = pci_assign_domain_nr(host->dev.parent);
-#else
-	host->domain = domain;
-#endif
-}
-
 /**
  * pci_ext_cfg_avail - can we access extended PCI config space?
  *
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h
index 0432889..e279147 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.h
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h
@@ -323,16 +323,7 @@ static inline int pci_dev_specific_reset(struct pci_dev *dev, int probe)
 
 struct pci_host_bridge *pci_find_host_bridge(struct pci_bus *bus);
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC
-void pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus, struct device *parent);
-#else
-static inline void pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus,
-					struct device *parent)
-{
-}
-#endif
 struct resource_entry *pci_busn_resource(struct list_head *resources);
-void pci_host_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_host_bridge *host, int domain);
 struct pci_host_bridge *pci_create_host_bridge(struct device *parent,
 		int domain, void *sysdata, struct list_head *resources,
 		struct pci_host_bridge_ops *ops);
diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
index c9bee34..164225e 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
@@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ void pci_read_bridge_bases(struct pci_bus *child)
 	}
 }
 
-static struct pci_bus *pci_alloc_bus(struct pci_bus *parent)
+static struct pci_bus *pci_alloc_bus(void)
 {
 	struct pci_bus *b;
 
@@ -500,10 +500,6 @@ static struct pci_bus *pci_alloc_bus(struct pci_bus *parent)
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&b->resources);
 	b->max_bus_speed = PCI_SPEED_UNKNOWN;
 	b->cur_bus_speed = PCI_SPEED_UNKNOWN;
-#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC
-	if (parent)
-		b->domain_nr = parent->domain_nr;
-#endif
 	return b;
 }
 
@@ -650,7 +646,7 @@ static struct pci_bus *pci_alloc_child_bus(struct pci_bus *parent,
 	/*
 	 * Allocate a new bus, and inherit stuff from the parent..
 	 */
-	child = pci_alloc_bus(parent);
+	child = pci_alloc_bus();
 	if (!child)
 		return NULL;
 
@@ -1875,14 +1871,13 @@ static struct pci_bus *pci_create_root_bus(
 		return NULL;
 	bus = busn_res->res->start;
 	parent = bridge->dev.parent;
-	b = pci_alloc_bus(NULL);
+	b = pci_alloc_bus();
 	if (!b)
 		return NULL;
 
 	b->sysdata = dev_get_drvdata(&bridge->dev);
 	b->ops = ops;
 	b->number = b->busn_res.start = bus;
-	pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(b, parent);
 
 	bridge->bus = b;
 	b->bridge = get_device(&bridge->dev);
diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
index 1ea69c7..c167503 100644
--- a/include/linux/pci.h
+++ b/include/linux/pci.h
@@ -469,9 +469,6 @@ struct pci_bus {
 	unsigned char	primary;	/* number of primary bridge */
 	unsigned char	max_bus_speed;	/* enum pci_bus_speed */
 	unsigned char	cur_bus_speed;	/* enum pci_bus_speed */
-#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC
-	int		domain_nr;
-#endif
 
 	char		name[48];
 
-- 
1.7.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-04-21 11:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-21 11:34 [PATCH v10 00/29] Refine PCI scan interfaces and make generic pci host bridge Yijing Wang
2015-04-21 11:34 ` [PATCH v10 01/29] xen/PCI: Don't use deprecated function pci_scan_bus_parented() Yijing Wang
2015-04-21 11:34 ` [PATCH v10 02/29] PCI: Remove deprecated pci_scan_bus_parented() Yijing Wang
2015-04-21 11:34 ` [PATCH v10 03/29] PCI: Save domain in pci_host_bridge Yijing Wang
2015-04-21 11:34 ` [PATCH v10 04/29] PCI: Move pci_bus_assign_domain_nr() declaration into drivers/pci/pci.h Yijing Wang
2015-04-21 11:34 ` [PATCH v10 05/29] PCI: Remove argument bus for pci_create_root_bus() Yijing Wang
2015-04-21 11:34 ` [PATCH v10 06/29] PCI: Alloc busn resource dynamically for pci_scan_bus() Yijing Wang
2015-04-21 11:34 ` [PATCH v10 07/29] PCI: Allocate busn resource for pci_scan_root_bus() Yijing Wang
2015-04-21 11:34 ` [PATCH v10 08/29] PCI: Introduce pci_host_assign_domain_nr() to assign domain Yijing Wang
2015-04-21 11:34 ` [PATCH v10 09/29] PCI: Separate pci_host_bridge creation out of pci_create_root_bus() Yijing Wang
2015-04-21 11:34 ` [PATCH v10 10/29] PCI: Introduce pci_host_bridge_list to manage host bridges Yijing Wang
2015-04-21 11:34 ` [PATCH v10 11/29] PCI: Save sysdata in pci_host_bridge drvdata Yijing Wang
2015-04-21 11:34 ` [PATCH v10 12/29] powerpc/PCI: Rename pcibios_root_bridge_prepare() to pcibios_set_root_bus_speed() Yijing Wang
2015-04-21 11:34 ` [PATCH v10 13/29] PCI: Move pcibios_root_bridge_prepare() to pci_create_host_bridge() Yijing Wang
2015-04-21 11:34 ` [PATCH v10 14/29] PCI: Introduce pci_host_bridge_ops to support host specific operations Yijing Wang
2015-04-21 11:34 ` [PATCH v10 15/29] PCI: Introduce new scan function pci_scan_host_bridge() Yijing Wang
2015-04-21 11:34 ` [PATCH v10 16/29] PCI: Introduce pci_bus_child_max_busnr() Yijing Wang
2015-04-21 11:34 ` [PATCH v10 17/29] x86/PCI: Refine pci_acpi_scan_root() with generic pci_host_bridge Yijing Wang
2015-04-21 11:34 ` [PATCH v10 18/29] ia64/PCI: " Yijing Wang
2015-04-21 11:34 ` [PATCH v10 19/29] powerpc/pci: Use pci_scan_host_bridge() for simplicity Yijing Wang
2015-04-21 11:34 ` [PATCH v10 20/29] PCI: Remove pcibios_root_bridge_prepare() and pcibos_set_root_bus_speed() Yijing Wang
2015-04-21 11:34 ` [PATCH v10 21/29] sparc/PCI: Use pci_scan_host_bridge() for simplicity Yijing Wang
2015-04-21 11:34 ` [PATCH v10 22/29] parisc/PCI: Use pci_scan_root_bus() " Yijing Wang
2015-04-21 11:34 ` [PATCH v10 23/29] PCI/mvebu: Use pci_common_init_dev() to simplify code Yijing Wang
2015-04-21 11:34 ` [PATCH v10 24/29] PCI/tegra: Remove redundant tegra_pcie_scan_bus() Yijing Wang
2015-04-21 11:34 ` [PATCH v10 25/29] PCI/designware: Use pci_scan_root_bus() for simplicity Yijing Wang
2015-04-21 11:34 ` [PATCH v10 26/29] PCI/xgene: Use pci_scan_root_bus() instead of pci_create_root_bus() Yijing Wang
2015-04-21 11:34 ` [PATCH v10 27/29] PCI: Rename __pci_create_root_bus() to pci_create_root_bus() Yijing Wang
2015-04-21 11:34 ` [PATCH v10 28/29] PCI: Remove platform specific pci_domain_nr() Yijing Wang
2015-04-21 11:34 ` Yijing Wang [this message]
2015-04-27  4:09 ` [PATCH v10 00/29] Refine PCI scan interfaces and make generic pci host bridge Daniel Axtens
2015-04-27  6:25   ` Yijing Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1429616088-10249-30-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com \
    --to=wangyijing@huawei.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dja@axtens.net \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn \
    --cc=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=liviu@dudau.co.uk \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox