linux-ia64.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
	SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] IA64-IRQ: Use kmalloc_array() in sn_irq_lh_init()
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 21:02:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1472245341.4914.79.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1608261557130.3645@hadrien>

On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 15:57 -0400, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Aug 2016, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> > Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 18:32:53 +0200
> >
> > * A multiplication for the size determination of a memory allocation
> >   indicated that an array data structure should be processed.
> >   Thus use the corresponding function "kmalloc_array".
> >
> >   This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> >
> > * Replace the specification of data structures by pointer dereferences
> >   to make the corresponding size determination a bit safer according to
> >   the Linux coding style convention.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> > ---
> >  arch/ia64/sn/kernel/irq.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/irq.c b/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/irq.c
[]
> > @@ -474,12 +474,12 @@ void __init sn_irq_lh_init(void)
> >  {
> >       int i;
> >
> > -     sn_irq_lh = kmalloc(sizeof(struct list_head *) * NR_IRQS, GFP_KERNEL);
> > +     sn_irq_lh = kmalloc_array(NR_IRQS, sizeof(*sn_irq_lh), GFP_KERNEL);
> >       if (!sn_irq_lh)
> >               panic("SN PCI INIT: Failed to allocate memory for PCI init\n");
> >
> >       for (i = 0; i < NR_IRQS; i++) {
> > -             sn_irq_lh[i] = kmalloc(sizeof(struct list_head), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +             sn_irq_lh[i] = kmalloc(*sn_irq_lh[i], GFP_KERNEL);
> 
> Did a sizeof get lost here?

Yes, thanks Julia.

This is why adding the generating spatch code is always good.

And Markus, please always compile test your code using the
appropriate cross-compilers available here:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/

And btw: using sizeof(*pp[i]) or sizeof(**pp) is not always
clearer or better than using sizeof(type)

If you _really wanted to clear up this code and make it more
robust/better, it'd probably be nicer to convert the
struct list_head **sn_irq_lh to a single struct list_head *
and do a single
	struct list_head *sn_irq_la = malloc_array(nr_irqs, sizeof(struct list_head);
instead of an malloc_array of the *sn_irq_lh and the
multiple individual struct list_head malloc entries
and change the INIT_LIST_HEAD and indexing code.

That would be less data space overall given the alignment
waste of the individual allocs.

It also appears that sn_irq_lh is extern in
arch/ia64/include/asm/sn/intr.h but could be made static
to arch/ia64/sn/kernel/irq.c.

But really, the conversion isn't worthwhile as NR_IRQS is
limited to much less than the maximum allocation / sizeof(ptr).


  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-26 21:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-26 18:00 [PATCH 0/5] IA64: Fine-tuning for some function implementations SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-26 18:02 ` [PATCH 1/5] IA64-IRQ: Use kmalloc_array() in sn_irq_lh_init() SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-26 19:57   ` Julia Lawall
2016-08-26 21:02     ` Joe Perches [this message]
2016-08-27  7:02       ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-28  0:40         ` Joe Perches
2016-08-28  7:37           ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-28  9:28           ` [PATCH 1/5] " Julia Lawall
2016-08-28 18:33             ` Joe Perches
2016-08-27  6:20     ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-26 20:18   ` [PATCH 1/5] " kbuild test robot
2016-08-27  8:48   ` walter harms
2016-08-26 18:03 ` [PATCH 2/5] IA64-IRQ: Delete unnecessary braces SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-26 20:27   ` kbuild test robot
2016-08-26 18:04 ` [PATCH 3/5] ia64/mm/tlb: Fix indentation in ia64_global_tlb_purge() SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-26 18:05 ` [PATCH 4/5] ia64/mm/tlb: Use kmalloc_array() in ia64_itr_entry() SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-26 18:06 ` [PATCH 5/5] ia64/mm/tlb: Delete unnecessary braces SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-26 20:42   ` kbuild test robot
2016-08-27  7:29     ` SF Markus Elfring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1472245341.4914.79.camel@perches.com \
    --to=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=elfring@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).