From: David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: making unwcheck.sh
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 23:33:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16391.9027.421063.491444@napali.hpl.hp.com> (raw)
>>>>> On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 17:20:48 +1100, Matt Chapman <matthewc@cse.unsw.edu.au> said:
Matt> Python seems to handle big numbers better but I don't really
Matt> know enough Python.
Well, attached is what I came up with (I'm not terribly proficient
in Python, I should say, so suggestions for improvements are welcome).
Of course, it promptly found a problem in mca_asm.S:
ERROR: function ia64_monarch_init_handler: 186 slots, sum of region len = 179
Actually, the entire mca_asm.S file looks rather atrocious. For
example, it doesn't take advantage of the ENTRY/END macros in
asm_macro.h. Could somebody look into fixing and cleaning this up?
Thanks,
--david
#!/usr/bin/env python
#
# Usage: unwcheck.py FILE
#
# This script checks the unwind info of each function in file FILE
# and verifies that the sum of the region-lengths matches the total
# length of the function.
#
# Based on a shell/awk script originally written by Harish Patil,
# which was converted to Perl by Matthew Chapman, which was converted
# to Python by David Mosberger.
#
import os
import re
import sys
if len(sys.argv) != 2:
print "Usage: %s FILE" % sys.argv[0]
sys.exit(-1)
readelf = os.getenv("READELF", "readelf")
start_pattern = re.compile("<([^>]*)>: \[0x([0-9a-f]+)-0x([0-9a-f]+)\]")
rlen_pattern = re.compile(".*rlen=([0-9]+)")
def check_func (func, slots, rlen_sum):
if slots != rlen_sum:
global num_errors
num_errors += 1
if not func: func = "at %#x" % start
print "ERROR: function %s: %lu slots, sum of region lengths = %lu" \
% (func, slots, rlen_sum)
return
num_funcs = 0
num_errors = 0
func = False
slots = 0
rlen_sum = 0
for line in os.popen("%s -u %s" % (readelf, sys.argv[1])):
m = start_pattern.match(line)
if m:
check_func(func, slots, rlen_sum)
func = m.group(1)
start = long(m.group(2), 16)
end = long(m.group(3), 16)
slots = 3 * (end - start) / 16
rlen_sum = 0L
num_funcs += 1
else:
m = rlen_pattern.match(line)
if m:
rlen_sum += long(m.group(1))
check_func(func, slots, rlen_sum)
if num_errors = 0:
print "No errors detected in %u functions." % num_funcs
else:
print "%u errors detected in %u functions." % (num_errors, num_funcs)
sys.exit(-1)
next reply other threads:[~2004-01-15 23:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-15 23:33 David Mosberger [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-11-14 18:38 making unwcheck.sh David Mosberger
2003-11-15 6:20 ` Matt Chapman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16391.9027.421063.491444@napali.hpl.hp.com \
--to=davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox