From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Mosberger Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 02:07:58 +0000 Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] linux-2.6.3-rc2_ia64-cyclone_A0 Message-Id: <16428.12670.436074.979908@napali.hpl.hp.com> List-Id: References: <1076556140.795.119.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <1076556140.795.119.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org >>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 17:41:44 -0800, Chris McDermott said: Chris> The x450/x455 doesn't set/implement the SAL ITC drift Chris> bit. Could you point us to where this is documentated? The Chris> latest SAL spec (Dec 2003) didn't have reference to this flag Chris> being implemented in the Platform Features Descriptor Entry Chris> in the SST. Hmmh, you're right: I don't see it either in the public documentation. I got confirmation from Intel on 8 Nov 2001 that bit 3 of the platform-feature vector will be defined as the ITC_DRIFT bit and the SAL documentation was supposed to have been updated Q1 2002. Looks to me like something got lost along the way. Can someone from Intel clarify? --david